295
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Determinants of support for directly-elected mayors in Ireland

ORCID Icon
Pages 667-684 | Published online: 06 Sep 2021
 

ABSTRACT

In May 2019, three Irish local authorities ran plebiscites alongside their local elections: Cork City Council, Limerick City and County Council, and Waterford City and County Council. The plebiscites were run to judge support for Government proposals to introduce a reformed, directly-elected mayoral office. The results were, in some ways, the worst possible from a Government perspective: a mix. While voters in Limerick backed the plan by a slight majority, it was marginally rejected in both Cork and Waterford. Faced with disappointing a large group of voters no matter the course of action taken, the Government shelved the plans for Cork and Waterford indefinitely, though the plan for Limerick may proceed. Despite the 2019 rejections, the 2020 UCD Online Election Poll (INES 1) found indications of high levels of support for these reforms: four-in-five respondents agreed that mayors should be directly elected, which is a significantly higher proportion than the Yes vote in any of the three plebiscite areas. This research uses further data from the online poll to establish correlates of support for these reforms, and tentatively suggests that partisan dynamics in turnout are why this support wasn’t reflected in the plebiscite results.

Acknowledgements

An early version of this paper was presented at the Political Studies Association of Ireland Annual Conference in October 2020, and I am very grateful for the participants’ engagement and feedback. I would also like to thank the editors of this special issue (David Farrell and Jos Elkink), as well as Mike Lewis-Beck and two anonymous reviewers provided by Irish Political Studies, for invaluable feedback that greatly strengthened the final version of the paper. Finally, I must thank Kathy D’Arcy for her always-patient proofreading of my work.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Luke Field

Luke Field is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Iceland’s Social Science Research Institute and Faculty of Political Science, working on NordForsk-funded research into public opinion on terrorism in the Nordic countries. His primary research interests include democracy and representation, campaigns, political parties, democratic innovations, and emotions in politics. He has previously worked at University College Dublin and University College Cork.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 186.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.