Abstract
During the pursuit of learnables in vocal master classes, masters frequently produce lengthy clusters of directives, while students and accompanists orient to early opportunities for putting directives into practice. Participants are therefore faced with a continuous necessity to negotiate whether a directive is to be put into practice “now” or “not now.” Accompanists typically initiate musical (re)performances and are therefore the first to respond to a master's instruction completion, often preempting it early on in a master's potentially final turn constructional unit. Master class participants have to coordinate two action types: masters orient to giving instructions through talk; students and pianists orient primarily to restarting the musical performance.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Charles Antaki, Ruth Parry, and three anonymous reviewers for their extremely helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
Notes
1Exceptions are CitationMondada (2009, 2011) and parts of CitationHindmarsh et al. (2011).
2This phenomenon is explored in more detail in Szczepek Reed and Reed (in press).
3This distinction is explored in more detail in the section “Local vs. Restart-Relevant Directives.”
4For transcript conventions, please see the appendix.
5For those readers who are not familiar with musical and performance-related terminology, we have tried to paraphrase the learnables for each extract. While we are aware of the danger of (mis)interpreting the data, especially in those cases where the learnable has not been stated explicitly, we hope that this makes the extracts more accessible to all readers.
6See CitationKoschmann & Zemel (2011) for an example of this phenomenon in medical training.