Abstract
Viewing a hostile media bias against one’s group (e.g., political party) is a perceptual effect of media use. When it comes to the portrayal of political parties in the United States, prior research suggests that both Democrats and Republicans see mainstream media coverage as favoring the other side, regardless of the orientation of the political news coverage. Although prior research has not identified all factors that make this perceptual bias more likely, or at explaining how or why this perceptual effect occurs, we do know that it is related to one’s group identity. In this study, we examined salient predictors of hostile media bias during the 2012 presidential campaign. Individual (i.e., political cynicism) and group identity related (i.e., group status, intergroup bias, political ideology) differences of media users predicted such perceptions. But, the medium selected for political information about the campaign also mattered. The use of two media in particular—TV and social networking sites—appear to have blunted hostile media bias perceptions, whereas the use of two other media—radio and video sharing sites—appear to have accentuated perceptions that the media were biased against one’s party
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Mei-Chen Lin
Mei-Chen Lin (Ph.D., University of Kansas) is an associate professor in the School of Communication Studies at Kent State University. Her research focuses on intergroup communication, and aging and older adulthood, such as age identity, caregiving in the family, and elder abuse.
Paul M. Haridakis
Paul M. Haridakis (Ph.D., Kent State University) is a professor in the School of Communication Studies at Kent State University. His research interests include media uses and effects; new communication technologies; politics, freedom of expression, sports, and media history.
Gary Hanson
Gary Hanson (M.A., Kent State University) is a professor in the School of Journalism & Mass Communication at Kent State University. His research interests include the impact of newer media on traditional media practices, new communication technologies, journalism ethics, and issues of journalistic accuracy.