Figures & data
FIGURE 1 Framework for DAI integrated approach to bearing prognostics Key: DAI-degradation assessment index; MLP-multilayer perceptron; RBF-radial basis function; BLR-Bayesian linear regression; GMR-Gaussian mixture regression; GPR-Gaussian process regression; RUL-remaining useful life.
![FIGURE 1 Framework for DAI integrated approach to bearing prognostics Key: DAI-degradation assessment index; MLP-multilayer perceptron; RBF-radial basis function; BLR-Bayesian linear regression; GMR-Gaussian mixture regression; GPR-Gaussian process regression; RUL-remaining useful life.](/cms/asset/4c1824c4-5b61-48bb-922f-8905894fc823/uaai_a_1038432_f0001_b.gif)
FIGURE 3 RMSE and MAPE for MLP, RBF, BLR, GMR, and GPR models for Bearing 1, based on the dependent samples.
![FIGURE 3 RMSE and MAPE for MLP, RBF, BLR, GMR, and GPR models for Bearing 1, based on the dependent samples.](/cms/asset/37e59bca-dc2c-4caa-ac7f-814c2d580fc6/uaai_a_1038432_f0003_oc.jpg)
FIGURE 4 RMSE and MAPE for MLP, RBF, BLR, GMR, and GPR models for Bearing 2, based on the dependent samples.
![FIGURE 4 RMSE and MAPE for MLP, RBF, BLR, GMR, and GPR models for Bearing 2, based on the dependent samples.](/cms/asset/5cffcc6a-4274-4766-aa7d-116793d0737e/uaai_a_1038432_f0004_oc.jpg)
FIGURE 5 RMSE and MAPE for MLP, RBF, BLR, GMR, and GPR models for Bearing 3, based on the dependent samples.
![FIGURE 5 RMSE and MAPE for MLP, RBF, BLR, GMR, and GPR models for Bearing 3, based on the dependent samples.](/cms/asset/2aca7ff3-7985-4c58-9982-06214e1140b1/uaai_a_1038432_f0005_oc.jpg)
FIGURE 6 Prediction for the whole bearing life for Bearing 1 using different methodologies based on dependent samples.
![FIGURE 6 Prediction for the whole bearing life for Bearing 1 using different methodologies based on dependent samples.](/cms/asset/373e090e-0605-4e75-98e7-ba9816bf12ce/uaai_a_1038432_f0006_oc.jpg)
FIGURE 7 Prediction for the whole bearing life for Bearing 2 using different methodologies based on dependent samples.
![FIGURE 7 Prediction for the whole bearing life for Bearing 2 using different methodologies based on dependent samples.](/cms/asset/89014b84-0654-4ab6-8ea9-10d81ad77022/uaai_a_1038432_f0007_oc.jpg)
FIGURE 8 Prediction for the whole bearing life for Bearing 3 using different methodologies based on dependent samples.
![FIGURE 8 Prediction for the whole bearing life for Bearing 3 using different methodologies based on dependent samples.](/cms/asset/dd7caed6-a861-457b-983e-2761bb34303e/uaai_a_1038432_f0008_oc.jpg)
FIGURE 9 RMSE and MAPE for MLP, RBF, BLR, GMR, and GPR models for Bearing 1, based on the independent samples.
![FIGURE 9 RMSE and MAPE for MLP, RBF, BLR, GMR, and GPR models for Bearing 1, based on the independent samples.](/cms/asset/36ddf3f6-5269-4ad8-b368-a48af165b4fe/uaai_a_1038432_f0009_oc.jpg)
FIGURE 10 RMSE and MAPE for MLP, RBF, BLR, GMR, and GPR models for Bearing 2, based on the independent samples.
![FIGURE 10 RMSE and MAPE for MLP, RBF, BLR, GMR, and GPR models for Bearing 2, based on the independent samples.](/cms/asset/72c1ae2b-ab00-494f-a9d3-2e4e189b72cb/uaai_a_1038432_f0010_oc.jpg)
FIGURE 11 RMSE and MAPE for MLP, RBF, BLR, GMR, and GPR models for Bearing 3, based on the independent samples.
![FIGURE 11 RMSE and MAPE for MLP, RBF, BLR, GMR, and GPR models for Bearing 3, based on the independent samples.](/cms/asset/7d672098-e0c3-4d1c-8bd0-23f7017b9753/uaai_a_1038432_f0011_oc.jpg)
FIGURE 12 Prediction for the whole bearing life using Bearing 2 and 3 as training set and Bearing 1 as test set based on different methodologies and independent samples.
![FIGURE 12 Prediction for the whole bearing life using Bearing 2 and 3 as training set and Bearing 1 as test set based on different methodologies and independent samples.](/cms/asset/7f685790-e7f9-4dc5-a18e-807ec3d6e7b1/uaai_a_1038432_f0012_oc.jpg)
FIGURE 13 Prediction for the whole bearing life using Bearing 1 and 3 as training set and Bearing 2 as test set based on different methodologies and independent samples.
![FIGURE 13 Prediction for the whole bearing life using Bearing 1 and 3 as training set and Bearing 2 as test set based on different methodologies and independent samples.](/cms/asset/14ba5084-c94d-4d1d-a10a-9f2159767e42/uaai_a_1038432_f0013_oc.jpg)
FIGURE 14 Prediction for the whole bearing life using Bearing 1 and 2 as training set and Bearing 3 as test set based on different methodologies and independent samples.
![FIGURE 14 Prediction for the whole bearing life using Bearing 1 and 2 as training set and Bearing 3 as test set based on different methodologies and independent samples.](/cms/asset/3563b045-f9ad-4a7b-8e64-7a8391b4f8f1/uaai_a_1038432_f0014_oc.jpg)
TABLE 1 Ranking of Models Based on Dependent and Independent Samples for Bearing 1
TABLE 2 Ranking of Models Based on Dependent and Independent Samples for Bearing 2
TABLE 3 Ranking of Models Based on Dependent and Independent Samples for Bearing 3