5,770
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Meltdown/Tantrum Detection System for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1708-1732 | Received 11 Dec 2020, Accepted 05 Oct 2021, Published online: 13 Oct 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Physiological parameters with wearable devices

Figure 1. MTDS block diagram.

Figure 1. MTDS block diagram.

Figure 2. (a) Specially designed hardware wristband prototype. (b) Specially designed hardware wristband connectivity diagram.

Figure 2. (a) Specially designed hardware wristband prototype. (b) Specially designed hardware wristband connectivity diagram.

Figure 3. CNN-LSTM architecture for the proposed system.

Figure 3. CNN-LSTM architecture for the proposed system.

Figure 4. Proposed work flow diagram of the proposed MTDS. (a) Proposed work flow of CNN-LSTM training and testing. (b) Proposed Work flow of CNN-LSTM validation.

Figure 4. Proposed work flow diagram of the proposed MTDS. (a) Proposed work flow of CNN-LSTM training and testing. (b) Proposed Work flow of CNN-LSTM validation.

Figure 4. Continued.

Figure 4. Continued.

Figure 5. Procedure for data acquisition and pre-classification.

Figure 5. Procedure for data acquisition and pre-classification.

Figure 6. Procedure for training and testing of the deep learning algorithm.

Figure 6. Procedure for training and testing of the deep learning algorithm.

Figure 7. Procedure for meltdown or tantrum detection and alerting.

Figure 7. Procedure for meltdown or tantrum detection and alerting.

Figure 8. Procedure for monitoring of meltdown or tantrum state.

Figure 8. Procedure for monitoring of meltdown or tantrum state.

Table 2. Training accuracy of CNN-LSTM vs. LSTM vs. CNN

Table 3. Testing accuracy of CNN-LSTM vs. LSTM vs. CNN

Figure 9. Training accuracy of CNN-LSTM vs. LSTM vs. CNN.

Figure 9. Training accuracy of CNN-LSTM vs. LSTM vs. CNN.

Figure 10. Testing accuracy of CNN-LSTM vs. LSTM vs. CNN.

Figure 10. Testing accuracy of CNN-LSTM vs. LSTM vs. CNN.

Figure 11. MTDS training and testing accuracy.

Figure 11. MTDS training and testing accuracy.

Figure 12. MTDS training and testing MAE.

Figure 12. MTDS training and testing MAE.

Figure 13. MTDS recall.

Figure 13. MTDS recall.

Figure 14. MTDS precision.

Figure 14. MTDS precision.

Figure 15. MTDS F1-score.

Figure 15. MTDS F1-score.

Table 4. Average of K-fold cross-validation of MTDS

Figure 16. Average of K-fold cross-validation of MTDS.

Figure 16. Average of K-fold cross-validation of MTDS.

Table 5. Caregiver’s responses for the proposed system

Figure 17. Responses of related caregivers for defined parameters and their overall mean.

Figure 17. Responses of related caregivers for defined parameters and their overall mean.

Table 6. Statistical analysis based on caregiver’s responses

Table 7. Comparative analysis of the proposed system and available technologies/systems

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.