2,745
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Automatic Detection of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Using UNET Based Segmentation and Statistical Analysis of Fused Deep Features

, , &
Pages 1952-1969 | Received 02 Apr 2021, Accepted 14 Oct 2021, Published online: 25 Oct 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Proposed system architecture for leukemia detection.

RFE – recursive feature elimination; MI – mutual information; mRmR – minimum recursive maximal relevance
Figure 1. Proposed system architecture for leukemia detection.

Figure 2. Architecture of U-Net for segmentation of WBC nucleus.

Figure 2. Architecture of U-Net for segmentation of WBC nucleus.

Figure 3. Typical microscopic images: (a) healthy cells and (b) blast cells.

Figure 3. Typical microscopic images: (a) healthy cells and (b) blast cells.

Figure 4. Segmentation of nucleus by U-Net: (a) healthy cells and (b) blast cells.

Figure 4. Segmentation of nucleus by U-Net: (a) healthy cells and (b) blast cells.

Figure 5. Performance of U-Net based segmentation.

Figure 5. Performance of U-Net based segmentation.

Figure 6. Heat map of fused features: (a) healthy cells and (b) blast cells.

Figure 6. Heat map of fused features: (a) healthy cells and (b) blast cells.

Figure 7. Heat map representation of selected features for healthy cells and blast cells: (a) MI (mutual information), (b) mRmR (minimum recursive maximal relevance) and (c) RFE (recursive feature elimination) based methods.

Figure 7. Heat map representation of selected features for healthy cells and blast cells: (a) MI (mutual information), (b) mRmR (minimum recursive maximal relevance) and (c) RFE (recursive feature elimination) based methods.

Figure 8. Heat map of 50% intersected features: (a) healthy cells and (b) blast cells.

Figure 8. Heat map of 50% intersected features: (a) healthy cells and (b) blast cells.

Table 1. Significance of features using ANOVA test

Table 2. Performance analysis of the proposed system with other recent deep learning networks

Table 3. Performance comparison of the proposed method with other existing methods using the ALL–IDB2 dataset

Figure 9. Variation in computational complexity vs different epochs for considered methods.

Figure 9. Variation in computational complexity vs different epochs for considered methods.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.