1,606
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Feature Selection for Supervised Learning and Compression

, , , &
Article: 2034293 | Received 27 May 2021, Accepted 18 Jan 2022, Published online: 06 Mar 2022

Figures & data

Table 1. The quantities of entropy that are maximized in each of the entropy based criterions.

Figure 1. Entropy Venn diagrams.

Figure 1. Entropy Venn diagrams.

Figure 2. Demonstration of (a) MR vs MR+C and (b) MRMR vs MRMR+C.

Figure 2. Demonstration of (a) MR vs MR+C and (b) MRMR vs MRMR+C.

Table 2. Feature selection performance measures investigated in the evaluation.

Figure 3. R2 performances for the FC task.

Figure 3. R2 performances for the FC task.

Figure 4. AUC performances for the PoI task.

Figure 4. AUC performances for the PoI task.

Figure 5. DEFLATE bytes performances for the FC task.

Figure 5. DEFLATE bytes performances for the FC task.

Figure 6. DEFLATE bytes performances for the PoI task.

Figure 6. DEFLATE bytes performances for the PoI task.

Figure 7. DWT bytes performances for the FC task.

Figure 7. DWT bytes performances for the FC task.

Figure 8. DWT bytes performances for the PoI task.

Figure 8. DWT bytes performances for the PoI task.

Table 3. Best performances (by R2) in the FC task selecting up to 15 features using (a) forward greedy and (b) lazy forward greedy search.

Table 4. Best performances (by AUC) in the PoI task selecting up to 15 features using (a) forward greedy and (b) lazy forward greedy search.

Figure 9. Number of feature set evaluations for the FC task.

Figure 9. Number of feature set evaluations for the FC task.

Figure 10. Number of feature set evaluations for the PoI task.

Figure 10. Number of feature set evaluations for the PoI task.