The evaluation method of college teachers’ morality considering intelligent emotion recognition and data mining algorithm

Figures & data

Figure 1. Utility function of risk appetite.

Figure 2. The relationship between teachers’ overconfidence $a_2^{\ast }$ and exogenous uncertainty variance ${\sigma }^2$, teachers’ effort cost coefficient c and risk aversion ${\rho }_A$.

Figure 3. Dual-processing model of moral judgment.

Figure 4. Moral model. (a) Model of the relationship between moral judgment and moral behavior, (b) Elemental model of the overall moral motivation module.

Figure 5. Illustration of the CNI model.

Figure 6. Differences in CNI model parameters between different personal sense of power groups.

Figure 7. Differences in CNI model parameters between different power priming groups.

Figure 8. Clustering of teachers’ morality evaluation in colleges and universities.