1,886
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Laboratory Study

Inhibitory effect of an aqueous extract of Radix Paeoniae Alba on calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis in a rat model

, , , &
Pages 120-129 | Received 29 Jul 2016, Accepted 25 Oct 2016, Published online: 13 Jan 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. CaOx crystal morphology and number (400×). (A) Crystal formation in the control group during the crystal dissolution test. (B) RPA extract (64.0 mg/mL) was added to the formed CaOx crystals for 24 h. (C) Number of crystals in the two tests.

Figure 1. CaOx crystal morphology and number (400×). (A) Crystal formation in the control group during the crystal dissolution test. (B) RPA extract (64.0 mg/mL) was added to the formed CaOx crystals for 24 h. (C) Number of crystals in the two tests.

Table 1. Biochemical variables in urine and kidney tissue (x ± s).

Figure 2. Histopathology and crystal deposition in the rat kidney. (A) Gross anatomy of the kidney (left to right: groups A, B, D and F). (B) Micrograph of HE-stained renal tissue. (C) Pathological alterations and CaOx-deposition scores. Green arrows indicate renal crystals; red arrows indicate inflammatory infiltration. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. *p < .05 compared with group A; #p < .05 compared with group B; and $p < .05 compared with group E.

Figure 2. Histopathology and crystal deposition in the rat kidney. (A) Gross anatomy of the kidney (left to right: groups A, B, D and F). (B) Micrograph of HE-stained renal tissue. (C) Pathological alterations and CaOx-deposition scores. Green arrows indicate renal crystals; red arrows indicate inflammatory infiltration. The data are presented as the mean ± SD. *p < .05 compared with group A; #p < .05 compared with group B; and $p < .05 compared with group E.

Figure 3. Bacterial urine cultures. (A) group A; (B) group B; (C) group D; and (D) group F.

Figure 3. Bacterial urine cultures. (A) group A; (B) group B; (C) group D; and (D) group F.

Figure 4. OPN immunostaining (A–F) in renal tissue (200×).

Figure 4. OPN immunostaining (A–F) in renal tissue (200×).

Figure 5. Western blots for OPN expression. (A) Renal OPN expression was analyzed by Western blotting. (B) Quantitative densitometric analysis of OPN expression. The data are presented as the mean ± SD of three experiments (*p < .05 compared with group A, #p < .05 compared with group B, and $p < .05 for group F compared with group E).

Figure 5. Western blots for OPN expression. (A) Renal OPN expression was analyzed by Western blotting. (B) Quantitative densitometric analysis of OPN expression. The data are presented as the mean ± SD of three experiments (*p < .05 compared with group A, #p < .05 compared with group B, and $p < .05 for group F compared with group E).