Figures & data
Table 1. The primer sequences.
Figure 1. Tacrolimus, SPE, SalB and RA reversed PAN-induced podocyte actin cytoskeletal injury (× 1000). (A) Untreated normal control; (B) PAN; (C) SPE, 158 g/mL; (D) SPE, 316 g/mL; (E) RA, 25 g/mL; (F) RA, 50 g/mL; (G) SalB, 8.5 g/mL; (H) SalB, 17 g/mL; (I) SalB and RA, 8.5 + 25 g/mL combined; (J) SalB and RA, 17 + 50 g/mL combined; (K) positive drug control.
![Figure 1. Tacrolimus, SPE, SalB and RA reversed PAN-induced podocyte actin cytoskeletal injury (× 1000). (A) Untreated normal control; (B) PAN; (C) SPE, 158 g/mL; (D) SPE, 316 g/mL; (E) RA, 25 g/mL; (F) RA, 50 g/mL; (G) SalB, 8.5 g/mL; (H) SalB, 17 g/mL; (I) SalB and RA, 8.5 + 25 g/mL combined; (J) SalB and RA, 17 + 50 g/mL combined; (K) positive drug control.](/cms/asset/ccce1032-3007-44a7-9a00-46bb843f2af9/irnf_a_1456460_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. The effects of SPE and monomer on TLR4 mRNA levels in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC
![Figure 2. The effects of SPE and monomer on TLR4 mRNA levels in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC](/cms/asset/29f838e0-2e8a-4f37-8b7d-f68a83655a70/irnf_a_1456460_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. The effects of SPE and monomers on MyD88 mRNA levels in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC.
![Figure 3. The effects of SPE and monomers on MyD88 mRNA levels in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC.](/cms/asset/31b40ddb-61bc-4437-abe5-e02d1eebf8e6/irnf_a_1456460_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. The effects of SPE and monomers on NF-kB mRNA level in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC
![Figure 4. The effects of SPE and monomers on NF-kB mRNA level in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC](/cms/asset/951cc980-2ada-4002-aafc-4f9aa68ecb28/irnf_a_1456460_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5. The effects of SPE and its monomers on the expression of TLR4 in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated normal control; PAN, injury model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC
![Figure 5. The effects of SPE and its monomers on the expression of TLR4 in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated normal control; PAN, injury model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC](/cms/asset/081ec16b-1096-4538-af72-9adcf40ce80e/irnf_a_1456460_f0005_b.jpg)
Figure 6. The effects of SPE and its monomers on the level of pp65 in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL group; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC
![Figure 6. The effects of SPE and its monomers on the level of pp65 in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL group; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC](/cms/asset/0782c402-c401-4f8b-bab6-9fb657c44c83/irnf_a_1456460_f0006_b.jpg)
Figure 7. The effects of SPE and its monomers on the expression of MyD88 in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated normal control; PAN, injury model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, 8.5 + 25 g/mL combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC
![Figure 7. The effects of SPE and its monomers on the expression of MyD88 in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated normal control; PAN, injury model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, 8.5 + 25 g/mL combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC](/cms/asset/5ac79863-c7c9-4fc4-8b7a-71b46a3492bb/irnf_a_1456460_f0007_b.jpg)