881
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Laboratory Study

Salvia przewalskii extract of total phenolic acids inhibit TLR4 signaling activation in podocyte injury induced by puromycin aminonucleoside in vitro

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 273-279 | Received 28 Jun 2017, Accepted 15 Mar 2018, Published online: 05 Apr 2018

Figures & data

Table 1. The primer sequences.

Figure 1. Tacrolimus, SPE, SalB and RA reversed PAN-induced podocyte actin cytoskeletal injury (× 1000). (A) Untreated normal control; (B) PAN; (C) SPE, 158 g/mL; (D) SPE, 316 g/mL; (E) RA, 25 g/mL; (F) RA, 50 g/mL; (G) SalB, 8.5 g/mL; (H) SalB, 17 g/mL; (I) SalB and RA, 8.5 + 25 g/mL combined; (J) SalB and RA, 17 + 50 g/mL combined; (K) positive drug control.

Figure 1. Tacrolimus, SPE, SalB and RA reversed PAN-induced podocyte actin cytoskeletal injury (× 1000). (A) Untreated normal control; (B) PAN; (C) SPE, 158 g/mL; (D) SPE, 316 g/mL; (E) RA, 25 g/mL; (F) RA, 50 g/mL; (G) SalB, 8.5 g/mL; (H) SalB, 17 g/mL; (I) SalB and RA, 8.5 + 25 g/mL combined; (J) SalB and RA, 17 + 50 g/mL combined; (K) positive drug control.

Figure 2. The effects of SPE and monomer on TLR4 mRNA levels in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC

Figure 2. The effects of SPE and monomer on TLR4 mRNA levels in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC

Figure 3. The effects of SPE and monomers on MyD88 mRNA levels in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC.

Figure 3. The effects of SPE and monomers on MyD88 mRNA levels in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC.

Figure 4. The effects of SPE and monomers on NF-kB mRNA level in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC

Figure 4. The effects of SPE and monomers on NF-kB mRNA level in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC

Figure 5. The effects of SPE and its monomers on the expression of TLR4 in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated normal control; PAN, injury model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC

Figure 5. The effects of SPE and its monomers on the expression of TLR4 in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated normal control; PAN, injury model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC

Figure 6. The effects of SPE and its monomers on the level of pp65 in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL group; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC

Figure 6. The effects of SPE and its monomers on the level of pp65 in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated control; PAN, model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL group; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, SalB + RA (8.5 + 25 g/mL) combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC

Figure 7. The effects of SPE and its monomers on the expression of MyD88 in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated normal control; PAN, injury model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, 8.5 + 25 g/mL combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC

Figure 7. The effects of SPE and its monomers on the expression of MyD88 in PAN-treated podocytes. NC, untreated normal control; PAN, injury model; SPE-L, 158 g/mL; SPE-H, 316 g/mL; SB-L, 8.5 g/mL; SB-H, 17 g/mL; RA-L, 25 g/mL; RA-H, 50 g/mL; H-L, 8.5 + 25 g/mL combined; H-H, SalB + RA (17 + 50 g/mL) combined; Tac. positive control. Note: *p < .05 vs. NC; +p < .05 vs. PAN; #p > .05 vs. NC