Figures & data
Figure. 1. The ratio of mucosal infections for IgAN patients in two groups. No mucosal infection in the Xi’an group was lower than that in the Guangzhou group. Upper respiratory infection and biliary tract infection in the Xi’an group was higher than that in the Guangzhou group. *p < .05 versus control.
![Figure. 1. The ratio of mucosal infections for IgAN patients in two groups. No mucosal infection in the Xi’an group was lower than that in the Guangzhou group. Upper respiratory infection and biliary tract infection in the Xi’an group was higher than that in the Guangzhou group. *p < .05 versus control.](/cms/asset/3965e8ad-6d0f-4036-b46c-a59ad5f1e4f3/irnf_a_1532907_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure. 2. The clinical presentations of patients with IgAN in two groups. Abnormal urinalysis in the Xi’an group was lower than that in the Guangzhou group. Debilitation and lumbago in the Xi’an group was higher than that in the Guangzhou group. *p < .05 versus control.
![Figure. 2. The clinical presentations of patients with IgAN in two groups. Abnormal urinalysis in the Xi’an group was lower than that in the Guangzhou group. Debilitation and lumbago in the Xi’an group was higher than that in the Guangzhou group. *p < .05 versus control.](/cms/asset/7ca87496-0b59-4281-b580-cfe10f310c20/irnf_a_1532907_f0002_b.jpg)
Table 1. The comparison of clinical characteristics between the two groups.