Figures & data
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the studied groups.
Table 2. . Different levels of U-NGAL and U-KIM-1 in groups 1 and 2.
Figure 1. Predictive margins for Urinary KIM-1 and HRS with 95% confidence intervals. The increasing levels of Urinary KIM-1 were not associated with an increasing probability of HRS in the univariate analysis.
![Figure 1. Predictive margins for Urinary KIM-1 and HRS with 95% confidence intervals. The increasing levels of Urinary KIM-1 were not associated with an increasing probability of HRS in the univariate analysis.](/cms/asset/9579d9ae-814b-4301-9694-98b76cb651c9/irnf_a_2346284_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Predictive margins for Urinary NGAL and HRS with 95% confidence intervals. The increasing levels of Urinary NGAL were not associated with an increasing probability of HRS in the univariate analysis.
![Figure 2. Predictive margins for Urinary NGAL and HRS with 95% confidence intervals. The increasing levels of Urinary NGAL were not associated with an increasing probability of HRS in the univariate analysis.](/cms/asset/35acf4ed-85ad-4e4c-80fc-cf5f79b76ab3/irnf_a_2346284_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. shows the receiver operating curve (ROC) for the sensitivity and specificity of Urinary KIM-1 for the prediction of the occurrence of HRS. At the level of 2.4 ng/mL (the 75th percentile), the area under curve was 0.88. Specificity and sensitivity were 61.1% and 52.9%, respectively at the same level.
![Figure 3. shows the receiver operating curve (ROC) for the sensitivity and specificity of Urinary KIM-1 for the prediction of the occurrence of HRS. At the level of 2.4 ng/mL (the 75th percentile), the area under curve was 0.88. Specificity and sensitivity were 61.1% and 52.9%, respectively at the same level.](/cms/asset/22a2b88b-4f8d-46ec-9d2a-b66c38d03c80/irnf_a_2346284_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 3. Association between urinary KIM-1 and NGAL and the presence of HRS.
Table 4. Estimation of the cutoff value of U-KIM-1 in patients with HRS.