Figures & data
Table 1. Comparison of clinical and coagulation features in patients with IMN and patients with MCD.
Figure 1. Biopsy finding of patients with IMN who were glomerular PLA2R staining-positive (GAg+). immunofluorescence includes staining for PLA2R, IgG and C3.
![Figure 1. Biopsy finding of patients with IMN who were glomerular PLA2R staining-positive (GAg+). immunofluorescence includes staining for PLA2R, IgG and C3.](/cms/asset/e3718bb6-ef67-4805-a2ee-3ba02086347d/irnf_a_2374448_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 2. Comparison of clinical and coagulation features in patients with IMN who were GAg + and patients with IMN who were GAg.
Table 3. Comparison of clinical and coagulation features in patients with IMN who were SAb+/GAg + and patients with IMN who were SAb-/GAg+.
Figure 2. The scatter plots indicate the correlation between anti-PLA2R antibodies and the coagulation indices in patients with IMN who were SAb+/GAg+. anti-PLA2R antibody was highly skewed, so natural log transformation was used for the analysis.
![Figure 2. The scatter plots indicate the correlation between anti-PLA2R antibodies and the coagulation indices in patients with IMN who were SAb+/GAg+. anti-PLA2R antibody was highly skewed, so natural log transformation was used for the analysis.](/cms/asset/ef2e2e37-3f82-411f-acab-25b70a960851/irnf_a_2374448_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 4. Multiple linear regression analysis of fibrinogen and clinical indicators in patients with IMN who were SAb+/GAg+.
Table 5. Multiple Linear regression analysis of the MA value and clinical indicators in patients with IMN who were SAb+/GAg+.
Data availability statement
The data underlying this article will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.