242
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Residents' experience of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) as a clinical tool following practical application: A mixed-methods study

, PhD, , MD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PsyD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD & , PhD, MD show all
Pages 306-314 | Published online: 14 Apr 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT), an evidence-based validated system for providing early detection and brief treatment of substance use disorders, has been widely used in the training of medical residents across specialties at a number of sites. This article investigates the effectiveness of SBIRT training during short-term follow-up at Albany Medical Center, one of the initial Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) grantees. Methods: Training outcomes were measured by training satisfaction following opportunities to apply SBIRT skills in clinical work, the rate at which these techniques were applied in clinical work, and the degree to which residents felt that the SBIRT training provided skills that were applicable to their practice. We examined differences in learning experience by postgraduate year and by program, and conducted a qualitative analysis in a convergent parallel mixed-methods design to elucidate barriers encountered by residents upon using SBIRT techniques in clinical practice. Results: Residents remained highly satisfied with the training at 4-month follow-up, with 80.1% reporting that they had used SBIRT skills in their clinical work. Use of SBIRT techniques was high at 6-month follow-up as well, with 85.9% of residents reporting that they regularly screened their patients for substance use, 74.4% reporting that they had applied brief intervention techniques, and 78.2% indicating that SBIRT training had made them overall more effective in helping patients with substance use issues. Differences in application rates and satisfaction were found by specialty. Qualitative analyses indicated that residents encountered patient readiness and specific contextual factors, such as time constraints, externally imposed values, and clinical norms, as barriers to implementation. Conclusions: Despite encountering obstacles such as time constraints and patient readiness, residents utilized many of the skills they had learned during SBIRT training in clinical practice and reported finding these skills useful in their management of patients with substance use issues.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the many colleagues, collaborators, and residents who have helped to make this program both possible and successful.

Author contributions

A. J. C. was involved in research conception and design, training, data analysis, interpretation of results, writing, and revision. V. I. B. was involved in research conception and design, training design, training, and writing. M. L. was involved in research conception and design, data analysis, interpretation of results, writing, and training. J. P. was involved in research conception and design, data analysis, interpretation of results, writing, and training. B. M. S. was involved in research conception and design, training design, training, and writing. I. M. M. was involved in research design, training design, and data collection. N. B. was involved in research conception, training, and data collection. M. R. L. was involved in research conception and design, manuscript editing, and training. P. P. was involved in training design, training, and research conception and design. A. A. was involved in training design, training, and research conception and design. C. J. H. was involved in research conception and design and training. S. H. was involved in research conception and training. S. D. G. was involved in research design and conception and training design.

Funding

Preparation of this report and the program described herein were supported by SAMHSA grant 1U79TI02069. SAMHSA provided funding for the development of training and the evaluation of training effectiveness. SAMHSA was not involved in the design of the training program, study design, or in manuscript preparation. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.