Contact angle anomalies indicate that surface-active eluates from silicone coatings inhibit the adhesive mechanisms of fouling organisms

Abstract

Silicone coatings with critical surface tensions (CST) between 20 and 30 mN m⁻¹ more easily release diverse types of biofouling than do materials of higher and lower CST. Oils added to these coatings selectively further diminish the attachment strengths of different marine fouling organisms, without significantly modifying the initial CST. In a search for the mechanisms of this improved biofouling resistance, the interfacial instabilities of four silicone coatings were characterised by comprehensive contact angle analyses, using up to 12 different diagnostic fluids selected to mimic the side chain chemistries of the common amino acids of bioadhesive proteins. The surfaces of painted steel test panels were characterised both before and after exposure to freshwater, brackish water, and seawater over periods ranging from 9 months to nearly 4 years. Contact angle measurements demonstrated significant surface activity of the oil-amended coatings both before and after long-term underwater exposure. The surface activity of the control (coating without oil) increased as a result of underwater exposure, consistent with mild surface chain scission and hydrolysis imparting a self-surfactancy to the coating and providing a weak boundary layer promoting continuing easy release of attaching foulants. Coatings with additives that most effectively reduced biofouling showed both initial and persistent contact angle anomalies for the test liquid, thiodiglycol, suggesting lower-shear biofouling release mechanisms based upon diminished bioadhesive crosslinking by interfering with hydrogen- and sulfhydryl bonds. Swelling of the silicone elastomeric coatings by hydrocarbon fluids was observed for all four coatings, before and after immersion.

Keywords:

• Silicone
• coatings
• contact angle
• surface-active
• stability
• biofouling

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by DARPA contract N00014-96-C-0145 to GE Corporate Research and Development. Robert Forsberg, Megan Rieman, Molly Moore, and Monika Chatrath (University at Buffalo) are gratefully acknowledged for their assistance. MR, MM, and MC were supported by NSF grant #EEC9712629. The authors thank Dr Erwin Vogler (Pennsylvania State University) for helpful discussion during preparation of the manuscript.