Publication Cover
Biofouling
The Journal of Bioadhesion and Biofilm Research
Volume 35, 2019 - Issue 1
2,812
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluating the effect of antiscalants on membrane biofouling using FTIR and multivariate analysis

, , &
Pages 1-14 | Received 31 Jul 2018, Accepted 03 Dec 2018, Published online: 23 Jan 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of biofilm formation conducted in a 24-well microtiter plate (modified from Lutskiy et al. Citation2015; Jung et al. Citation2018).

Figure 1. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of biofilm formation conducted in a 24-well microtiter plate (modified from Lutskiy et al. Citation2015; Jung et al. Citation2018).

Figure 2. FTIR spectra of RO membranes after exposure to different media in the presence of H. aquamarina (incubation: 48 h at 30 °C; concentration: 1g l1). Virgin RO – pure RO membrane surface; Negative control – MSM (no carbon source) with bacteria and MSM + carbon source (acrylic/maleic/poly acrylic acid/glucose) without bacteria; Positive control – glucose in MSM; AA + MSM – acrylic acid in MSM; PAA + MSM – poly acrylic acid in MSM; MA + MSM – maleic acid in MSM.

Figure 2. FTIR spectra of RO membranes after exposure to different media in the presence of H. aquamarina (incubation: 48 h at 30 °C; concentration: 1g l−1). Virgin RO – pure RO membrane surface; Negative control – MSM (no carbon source) with bacteria and MSM + carbon source (acrylic/maleic/poly acrylic acid/glucose) without bacteria; Positive control – glucose in MSM; AA + MSM – acrylic acid in MSM; PAA + MSM – poly acrylic acid in MSM; MA + MSM – maleic acid in MSM.

Table 1. Peak assignments to characterize biofilm layerTable Footnote*.

Figure 3. Increase in absorbance for selected peaks representing: (A) fatty acids and phospholipids, (B) polysaccharides, (C) protein components of the biofilm layer. Neg. control – MSM (no carbon source) with bacteria, and MSM + carbon source (acrylic/maleic/poly acrylic acid/glucose) without bacteria; Pos. control – glucose in MSM; AA + MSM – acrylic acid in MSM; PAA + MSM – poly acrylic acid in MSM; MA + MSM – maleic acid in MSM.

Figure 3. Increase in absorbance for selected peaks representing: (A) fatty acids and phospholipids, (B) polysaccharides, (C) protein components of the biofilm layer. Neg. control – MSM (no carbon source) with bacteria, and MSM + carbon source (acrylic/maleic/poly acrylic acid/glucose) without bacteria; Pos. control – glucose in MSM; AA + MSM – acrylic acid in MSM; PAA + MSM – poly acrylic acid in MSM; MA + MSM – maleic acid in MSM.

Figure 4. Clustering of variables obtained through PCA using The Unscrambler (V10.5).

Figure 4. Clustering of variables obtained through PCA using The Unscrambler (V10.5).

Figure 5. Biplot obtained for (A) the proteins; (B) the fatty acids and phospholipids; (C) the polysaccharide components of the biofilm using XLSTAT (V2016).

Figure 5. Biplot obtained for (A) the proteins; (B) the fatty acids and phospholipids; (C) the polysaccharide components of the biofilm using XLSTAT (V2016).

Figure 6. Clustering of the biofilm components obtained in the presence of different carbon sources.

Figure 6. Clustering of the biofilm components obtained in the presence of different carbon sources.

Figure 7. CFU counts obtained from biofouled RO membranes.

Figure 7. CFU counts obtained from biofouled RO membranes.