Publication Cover
Society & Natural Resources
An International Journal
Volume 31, 2018 - Issue 1
692
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Differential Effects of Cognitive and Structural Social Capital on Empowerment in Two Community Ecotourism Projects in Ghana

, , &
Pages 57-73 | Received 16 Sep 2016, Accepted 08 Jul 2017, Published online: 27 Oct 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Researchers have cautioned against both erasing conceptual complexities and homogenizing communities in community-based natural resources (CBNRM) studies and interventions. Social capital is seen as an enabler of CBNRM, yet we argue that differential access to social capital and associated outcomes deserves greater attention to avoid oversimplification of community interventions. Drawing upon literature on social networks and social capital, we analyze survey and network data from two community ecotourism cases in Ghana to advance understanding of the empowering capacities and limitations of CBNRM through social capital access. Subpopulations within communities are considered. Results show that residents with greater access to social capital report greater levels of empowerment. However, that relationship seems to be conditioned by one’s involvement, demographics, and by the empowerment dimension under analysis. Implications of the differing relationships between cognitive and structural social capital in relation to several empowerment outcomes are discussed from theoretical, methodological, and practical perspectives.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the local communities for their engagement and participation in this study.

Notes

We refrain from citing the name of the communities to protect their identity.

Preliminary t-tests examining differences between samples regarding empowerment and social capital variables show that people involved in ecotourism (S2) score higher than the community at large (S1) by nearly all measures of social capital and empowerment. Exceptions to this include the trust, reciprocity, and collaboration measures, where no significant differences between S1 and S2 were observed.

SE are available upon request.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a SSHRC Insight Development (430-2012-0158, UBC BREB H10-02499), various grants from the University of British Columbia and the UBC Public Scholar Initiative.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 260.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.