Figures & data
Figure 1. Social Practice Intervention Framework. The figure showcases the conceptual model adapted from Doddema et al. (Citation2018) and inspired by practice theory (Schatzki Citation2002; Shove, Pantzar, and Watson Citation2012; Spaargaren, Weenink, and Lamers Citation2016) that is used to study responses to interventions. The figure depicts the three analytical steps of the framework: the existing sets of practices, the deroutinisation resulting from the intervention and the re-routinisation of existing sets of practices and the emergence of new practices. In each step, both the performance, that is, the active integration of elements as well as the embeddedness, that is, the linkages between sets of practices are explored.
Figure 2. Practices organizing the flow of tuna and information in Labuhan Lombok. The six images depict the sequential (daily) sets of practices performed by practitioners at various places in and around Labuhan Lombok port that are implicated by the EU IUU regulation. The two interventions are shown in black boxes. These include Intervention A “obtaining the SKPI to verify legality of catches” and Intervention B “compiling the SKPI to match tuna transported to the export.”
Figure 3. Practices organizing the flow of tuna and information in North Buru. The five images depict the sequential (daily) sets of practices performed by practitioners at various places in and around fishing communities in North Buru that are implicated by FairTrade certification. The five interventions are shown in the black boxes. These include Intervention C “plastic tags to ID Fair Trade loins,” Intervention D “codes to ID Fair Trade loins,” Intervention E “logbooks as record of Fair Trade transactions,” Intervention F “transport note as record of Fair Trade transactions” and Intervention G “OurFish app as record of Fair Trade transactions.”
Table 1. Key response dynamics to traceability interventions.