Mutual combination of selected principles and technologies of Industry 4.0 and quality management methods - case study

Figures & data

Figure 1. “Smart Factory Line” and its facilities.

Figure 2. “Smart Factory Line” visualization.

Figure 3. “Smart Factory Line” digital twin in Technomatic SW.

Figure 4. Vizualization of three variants of the main product.

Figure 5. Product design.

Figure 6. LEGO product.

Figure 7. Visualization for product ordering.

Figure 8. Containers for transporting components.

Figure 9. Structure of the product.

Figure 10. Function analysis.

Figure 11. Failure analysis of the “bottom part”.

Figure 12. Risk analysis for the system element “bottom part”.

Figure 13. An example of the optimization phase.

Figure 14. Flow chart of the assembly process.

Table 1. SWOT analysis.

S	INTERNAL STRENGTHS	W	INTERNAL WEAKNESSSES
1	Synergetic application and development of Hard, Soft and IT skills	1	High time and organizational requirements
2	Better student preparation for practice	2	Dependence on other departments and the private sector
3	Cooperation with private subjects	3	The need of a proactive approach and student motivation
4	Increased student satisfaction and engagement	4	Difficulty of implementation in case of stricter epidemiological measures
5	Involvement of a wide range of fields of study and departments
O	EXTERNAL OPPORTUNITIES	T	EXTERNAL THREATS
1	Change of mindset and attitude of academic staff	1	Lack of willingness to share know-how of the involved subjects
2	Involvement of experts from practice in teaching	2	More possibility of "cheating" by students
3	Availability of advanced SW and HW	3	Unwillingness to change on the part of university staff and management
4	Increasing the prestige of the field study and the university	4	High workload of involved staff (mentors)
5	Faster implementation of the latest knowledge from practice into teaching