![Sample our Language & Literature journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5941/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Language-Literature.jpg"})
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 Berger, “Why Look at Animals?” 6.
2 Berger, “Why Look at Animals?” 6.
3 Rigby, “Writing in the Anthropocene,” 173.
4 Huff, “After Auto, after Bio,” 279. Sheep would not want to “deprivilege sight” for themselves. Their eyes are specially adapted, by a long and narrow pupil, always to see the scattered flock grazing around them.
5 Huff, “After Auto, after Bio,” 279.
6 Armstrong, Sheep, 7.
7 Berger, “Why Look at Animals?” 11.
8 Huff, “After Auto, after Bio,” 280.
9 Davison, Man-shy.
10 Davison, Dusty.
11 Meares, “Whippet,” 351.
12 Huff, “After Auto, after Bio,” 280.
13 Latour, Facing Gaia, 70.
14 Huff, “After Auto, after Bio,” 279.
15 Schlunke, Stories of the Riverina, vii.
16 Latour, Facing Gaia, 35.
17 Schlunke, Stories of the Riverina, 3.
18 Schlunke, Stories of the Riverina, 22.
19 Huff “After Auto, after Bio,” 280; Schlunke, Stories of the Riverina, 58–64.
20 Schlunke, Stories of the Riverina, 58.
21 Huff, “After Auto, after Bio,” 279.
22 Rigby, “Writing in the Anthropocene,” 173.
23 Schlunke, Stories of the Riverina, 59.
24 Huff, “After Auto, after Bio,” 279.