Figures & data
Figure 1. Inbreeding per chromosome estimated from the proportion of the chromosome covered by ROH for the 29 autosomes in the three populations (from detectRUNS (Biscarini et al. Citation2018)). MG, Norwegian Milk goat AI rams; Se, Norwegian coastal goat Selje; Sk, Norwegian coastal goat Skorpa.
Table 1. Observed (Heto) heterozygosity, average genetic distance within population (D), inbreeding based on excess of homozygotes (FHOM) and inbreeding based on the proportion of the genome covered by runs of homozygosity (FROH). MG, Norwegian Milk goat AI rams; Se, Norwegian coastal goat Selje; Sk, Norwegian coastal goat Skorpa. Mean ± std.
Table 2. Contributions from K postulated ancestral populations, using a likelihood-based model as implemented in Admixture (Alexander et al. Citation2009). Mean (+ SD) contributions from K ancestral populations assuming values of K ranging from 2 to 5 (cv.error = cross-validation error).
Figure 2. Clustering based on genetic distance between the 96 individuals from the three populations. MG, Norwegian Milk goat AI rams; Se, Norwegian coastal goat Selje; Sk, Norwegian coastal goat Skorpa.
Figure 3. Historical effective population sizes in the island and mainland population of coastal goat estimated from linkage disequilibrium. MG, Norwegian Milk goat AI rams; Se, Norwegian coastal goat Selje; Sk, Norwegian coastal goat Skorpa.
