Figures & data
Figure 1. Dynamic change of soil infiltration rate as a function of time under three different head heights.
![Figure 1. Dynamic change of soil infiltration rate as a function of time under three different head heights.](/cms/asset/00cb4678-8f01-4552-a40b-fd1e8e21011d/sagb_a_1859607_f0001_ob.jpg)
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of soil water content before (θ0) and after (θs) infiltration, Δθ = θs – θ0.
Table 2. The relationship between soil water content change Δθ and the average values of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity ks and Green-Ampt wetting front suction ψ.
Figure 2. The relationships between the parameter values of Ks (A) and Ψ (B) estimated using Δθ measured at every test point and the ones predicted using mean Δθ.
![Figure 2. The relationships between the parameter values of Ks (A) and Ψ (B) estimated using Δθ measured at every test point and the ones predicted using mean Δθ.](/cms/asset/81fedd41-1f3c-4a00-96b0-7be247793114/sagb_a_1859607_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. The relationship between estimated soil saturated hydraulic conductivity ks and infiltration time ti. CI means cumulative infiltration.
![Figure 3. The relationship between estimated soil saturated hydraulic conductivity ks and infiltration time ti. CI means cumulative infiltration.](/cms/asset/8fd1936a-5249-45df-b12a-9078fbc4cfda/sagb_a_1859607_f0003_ob.jpg)
Table 3. Linear regression coefficients between soil saturated hydraulic conductivity ks and the reciprocal of infiltration time 1/ti.
Figure 4. The relationship between estimated and predicted values of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity ks.
![Figure 4. The relationship between estimated and predicted values of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity ks.](/cms/asset/3a224b9c-975d-4e99-a1d5-02550c0589ac/sagb_a_1859607_f0004_oc.jpg)