711
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Sepiolite is recommended for the remediation of Cd-contaminated paddy soil

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 110-116 | Received 02 Sep 2008, Published online: 15 Sep 2009

Figures & data

Figure 1.  X-ray diffraction patterns of sepiolite (A) and lime (B). •: Sepiolite; □: Quartz;▴:Calcium Hydroxide; ○: Calcite.

Figure 1.  X-ray diffraction patterns of sepiolite (A) and lime (B). •: Sepiolite; □: Quartz;▴:Calcium Hydroxide; ○: Calcite.

Figure 2.  Relationships between soil pH and Cd concentrations in soil extracted by 0.1M NaNO3 (A), 0.01 M CaCl2 (B) and DTPA (C). (◊) CK: Control (unamended); (▴) L: Lime applied at 150 g m−2; (▪) S: Sepiolite applied at 2250 g m−2; (•) LS: Lime applied (at 150 g m−2) in a mixture with sepiolite (at 2250 g m−2). ***Significant at p <0.001; *Significant at p <0.05.

Figure 2.  Relationships between soil pH and Cd concentrations in soil extracted by 0.1M NaNO3 (A), 0.01 M CaCl2 (B) and DTPA (C). (◊) CK: Control (unamended); (▴) L: Lime applied at 150 g m−2; (▪) S: Sepiolite applied at 2250 g m−2; (•) LS: Lime applied (at 150 g m−2) in a mixture with sepiolite (at 2250 g m−2). ***Significant at p <0.001; *Significant at p <0.05.

Table I. Mean values of pH, CEC, CaCO3, DCB-Fe and single-extractable Cd in plough-layer soils treated by different amendments (n=3 for each treatment).

Figure 3.  Distribution of cadmium (%) in soil affected by different amendments (□) EX: Water-soluble plus exchangeable Cd; (

) CB: Carbonate-bound Cd; (□) OX: Fe/Al oxides-bound Cd; (□) OC: Organic-bound Cd; (▪) RES: Residual Cd. The percentages assigned the same letter are not significantly different between treatments (LSD, p>0.05).

Figure 3.  Distribution of cadmium (%) in soil affected by different amendments (□) EX: Water-soluble plus exchangeable Cd; (Display full size) CB: Carbonate-bound Cd; (□) OX: Fe/Al oxides-bound Cd; (□) OC: Organic-bound Cd; (▪) RES: Residual Cd. The percentages assigned the same letter are not significantly different between treatments (LSD, p>0.05).

Figure 4.  Biomass productions obtained for different treatments (kg ha−1, Dry weight) (□) CK; (□) L;(□) S;(▪) LS. Means and standard errors followed by the same letter are not significantly different (LSD, p>0.05).

Figure 4.  Biomass productions obtained for different treatments (kg ha−1, Dry weight) (□) CK; (□) L;(□) S;(▪) LS. Means and standard errors followed by the same letter are not significantly different (LSD, p>0.05).

Figure 5.  Cadmium contents (mg kg−1, Dry weight) in brown rice, hull and straw (□) CK; (□) L; (□) S; (▪) LS. Means and standard errors followed by the same letter are not significantly different (LSD, p>0.05).

Figure 5.  Cadmium contents (mg kg−1, Dry weight) in brown rice, hull and straw (□) CK; (□) L; (□) S; (▪) LS. Means and standard errors followed by the same letter are not significantly different (LSD, p>0.05).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.