Prefabricated orality at tone level: Bringing dubbing intonation into the spotlight

Figures & data

Figure 1. Typical display from SFS/WASP.

Figure 2. Occurrence of falling tones per utterance type.

Table 1. Occurrence of the high fall, the low fall, and the rise-fall per utterance type.

Utterance type	% High fall	% Low fall	% Rise-fall	% Total
Statements	24	38	7	69
Questions	14	25	0	39
Exclamations	32	30	10	72
Commands	30	43	7	80

Figure 3. Occurrence of rising tones per utterance type.

Table 2. Occurrence of the high rise, the low rise, and the fall-rise per utterance type.

Utterance type	% High rise	% Low rise	% Fall-rise	% Total
Statements	3	5	0	8
Questions	34	9	0	43
Exclamations	8	8	0	16
Commands	5	5	0	10

Figure 4. Occurrence of level tones per utterance type.

Table 3. Occurrence of the high level, the mid level, and the low level per utterance type.

Utterance type	% High level	% Mid level	% Low level	% Total
Statements	4	4	15	23
Questions	7.5	2.5	8	18
Exclamations	3	7	2	12
Commands	5	3	2	10