958
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Food & Nutrition Science

Development of singlet oxygen absorption capacity (SOAC) assay method. 4. Measurements of the SOAC values for vegetable and fruit extracts

, , &
Pages 280-291 | Received 25 Jul 2014, Accepted 10 Sep 2014, Published online: 31 Oct 2014

Figures & data

Table 1. Contents of Seven Carotenoids in 23 Kinds of Vegetable and Fruit Extracts.

Fig. 1. Measurement of the second-order rate constant (kQ) for the reaction of pumpkin-1 extract with 1O2.

Notes: (A) Absorption spectrum of pumpkin-1 extract in ethanol/chloroform/D2O. The concentration of pumpkin-1 extract is 5.34 g/L. (B) Change in absorbance of DPBF at 413 nm during the reaction of DPBF with 1O2 in the absence and presence of sample (α-tocopherol and pumpkin-1 extracts) in ethanol/chloroform/D2O at 35 °C. [DPBF]t=0 = 6.26 × 10−5 M and [EP]t = 0 = 4.18 × 10−4 M. The values of [α-Toc]t = 0 and [pumpkin-1]t=0 are shown in panel B. (C) Change in absorbance of DPBF, where the correction of baseline due to pumpkin-1 extract was performed. (D) Plot of ln (absorbance) vs. t. (E) Plot of Sblank/Spumpkin-1 vs. [pumpkin-1]. (F) Plot of / vs. [pumpkin-1].

Fig. 1. Measurement of the second-order rate constant (kQ) for the reaction of pumpkin-1 extract with 1O2.Notes: (A) Absorption spectrum of pumpkin-1 extract in ethanol/chloroform/D2O. The concentration of pumpkin-1 extract is 5.34 g/L. (B) Change in absorbance of DPBF at 413 nm during the reaction of DPBF with 1O2 in the absence and presence of sample (α-tocopherol and pumpkin-1 extracts) in ethanol/chloroform/D2O at 35 °C. [DPBF]t=0 = 6.26 × 10−5 M and [EP]t = 0 = 4.18 × 10−4 M. The values of [α-Toc]t = 0 and [pumpkin-1]t=0 are shown in panel B. (C) Change in absorbance of DPBF, where the correction of baseline due to pumpkin-1 extract was performed. (D) Plot of ln (absorbance) vs. t. (E) Plot of Sblank/Spumpkin-1 vs. [pumpkin-1]. (F) Plot of / vs. [pumpkin-1].

Table 2. Employed Concentrations, First-Order Decay Rates (S) and Half-Lives (t1/2) of Blank (DPBF Only), α-Tocopherol, and Samples 1 – 4 ((A) Pumpkin-1, (B) Eggplant-2, and (C) Strawberry-1) and Relative SOAC Values in Ethanol/Chloroform/D2O Solution.

Table 3. (S) and (t1/2) Values Observed for (A) 16 Vegetable and (B) 7 Fruit Extracts in Ethanol/Chloroform/D2O Solution at 35.0oC, Relative Rate Constants ( (S)/ (S)), Relative SOAC Values, (S) Values Calculated, and Ratio ((B)/(A)).

Fig. 2. Measurement of the second-order rate constant (kQ) for the reaction of Chinese leek-1 extract with 1O2.

Notes: (A) Absorption spectrum of Chinese leek-1 extract in ethanol/chloroform/D2O. The concentration of Chinese leek-1 extract is 1.34 g/L. (B) Change in absorbance of DPBF at 413 nm during the reaction of DPBF with 1O2 in the absence and presence of sample (α-tocopherol and Chinese leek-1 extracts) in ethanol/chloroform/D2O at 35 °C. [DPBF]t=0 = 6.42 × 10−5 M and [EP]t=0 = 4.33 × 10−4 M. The values of [α-Toc]t=0 and [Chinese leek-1]t=0 are shown in panel B. (C) Change in absorbance of DPBF, where the correction of baseline due to Chinese leek-1 extract was performed. (D) Plot of ln (absorbance) vs. t. (E) Plot of Sblank/SChinese leek-1 vs. [Chinese leek-1]. (F) Plot of / vs. [Chinese leek-1].

Fig. 2. Measurement of the second-order rate constant (kQ) for the reaction of Chinese leek-1 extract with 1O2.Notes: (A) Absorption spectrum of Chinese leek-1 extract in ethanol/chloroform/D2O. The concentration of Chinese leek-1 extract is 1.34 g/L. (B) Change in absorbance of DPBF at 413 nm during the reaction of DPBF with 1O2 in the absence and presence of sample (α-tocopherol and Chinese leek-1 extracts) in ethanol/chloroform/D2O at 35 °C. [DPBF]t=0 = 6.42 × 10−5 M and [EP]t=0 = 4.33 × 10−4 M. The values of [α-Toc]t=0 and [Chinese leek-1]t=0 are shown in panel B. (C) Change in absorbance of DPBF, where the correction of baseline due to Chinese leek-1 extract was performed. (D) Plot of ln (absorbance) vs. t. (E) Plot of Sblank/SChinese leek-1 vs. [Chinese leek-1]. (F) Plot of / vs. [Chinese leek-1].

Fig. 3. Comparison of (A) the relative rate constants ( (S)/ (S)) and (B) the relative SOAC values for 16 vegetable and 7 fruit extracts in ethanol/chloroform/D2O solution.

Fig. 3. Comparison of (A) the relative rate constants ( (S)/ (S)) and (B) the relative SOAC values for 16 vegetable and 7 fruit extracts in ethanol/chloroform/D2O solution.
short-legendScheme 1.
Supplemental material

972329_Supplemental_Material.docx

Download MS Word (25.1 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.