990
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Generation of a glucose de-repressed mutant of Trichoderma reesei using disparity mutagenesis

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 486-492 | Received 06 Aug 2015, Accepted 02 Sep 2015, Published online: 05 Nov 2015

Figures & data

Fig. 1. Scheme for the construction of pAH and pAH-mutDPD.

Notes: pAH has a pBluescript II backbone into which AMAI, a replication origin in A. nidulans, and Hygr, a hygromycin resistant gene in fungi, were inserted. pAH-mDPD was constructed by the insertion of mutDPD, DNA polymerase δ lacking proofreading activity, into pAH.
Fig. 1. Scheme for the construction of pAH and pAH-mutDPD.

Fig. 2. Plasmid insertion confirmed by PCR.

Notes: The introduction of pAH or pAH-mutDPD into T. reesei was verified by PCR. The partial sequence of GAPDH (internal control of genomic DNA extraction) and Hygr (marker of inserted vector) were amplified from genomic DNA of transformants as template. The partial sequence of Hygr was amplified from the DNA of purified pAH and pAH-mutDPD plasmids, and GAPDH was amplified from the genomic DNA of the parent strain.
Fig. 2. Plasmid insertion confirmed by PCR.

Table 1. Mutation ratio of disparity mutagenesis evaluated by colony formation in comparison to UV-irradiation.

Fig. 3. Colony formation of glucose de-repressed mutant and parent.

Notes: The M1 mutant strain, which was arbitrarily selected from among six glucose de-repressed mutants, and the parental strain were grown on agar plates for 5 days at 30 °C. (a) potato dextrose; (b) glucose; (c) Avicel (crystalline cellulose). The scale bar in the photograph indicates 1 cm.
Fig. 3. Colony formation of glucose de-repressed mutant and parent.

Fig. 4. Scanning electron microscopy of conidia and mycelia.

Notes: (a) parent; (b) M1 mutant. Magnification:1500 times. The scale bar in the photograph indicates 30 μm.
Fig. 4. Scanning electron microscopy of conidia and mycelia.

Fig. 5. Expression of cre1 analyzed by RT-PCR.

Notes: The primers and PCR conditions used are described in the “Materials and Methods”.
Fig. 5. Expression of cre1 analyzed by RT-PCR.

Fig. 6. Cellulase activity of the glucose de-repressed mutants (M1–4) and parent strain.

Notes: (a) glucose medium; (b) Avicel medium. The cellulase activity was measured as pNP-lactoside hydrolyzing activity. The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (error bars) obtained from three independent experiments.
Fig. 6. Cellulase activity of the glucose de-repressed mutants (M1–4) and parent strain.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.