1,404
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Screening of dietary antioxidants against mitochondria-mediated oxidative stress by visualization of intracellular redox stateFootnote

, &
Pages 726-734 | Received 15 Sep 2015, Accepted 09 Nov 2015, Published online: 14 Jan 2016

Figures & data

Fig. 1. FRET analysis of CHO cells treated with antioxidants under proteasome inhibition.

Notes: FRET ratio images of CHO cells expressing Redoxfluor after 8-h treatment are shown in the left panel. All images are the same magnification; scale bar = 30 μm. Quantitated values are shown as the mean ± SEM of three independent measurements in the right panel. (A) Treatment with DMSO (control), MG132, PQQ + MG132, Bio-PQQ™ + MG132, resveratrol (Res) + MG132, and sesamin (Ses) + MG132. (B) Treatment with lycopene (Lyc) + MG132 and S-allyl cysteine (SAC) + MG132. (C) Treatment with DL-α-tocopherol (α-toco) + MG132, (±)-α-lipoic acid (ALA) + MG132, DL-sulforaphane (SFN) + MG132 and SFN alone (left panel). All of the reagents except PQQ and Bio-PQQ™, which were used at 30 μM, were used at 10 μM. ** p < 0.01.
Fig. 1. FRET analysis of CHO cells treated with antioxidants under proteasome inhibition.

Fig. 2. Detection of mitochondrial ROS.

Notes: Mitochondrial ROS were detected using MitoSOX Red probe after 8-h treatment. Representative fluorescence images of MitoSOX Red are shown in the left panels. All images are the same magnification; scale bar = 50 μm. The quantitated relative fluorescence intensities are shown as the mean ± SEM of three independent measurements in the right panels. (A) Treatment with DMSO (control), MG132, PQQ + MG132, Bio-PQQ™ + MG132, Res + MG132 and Ses + MG132. (B) Treatment with Lyc + MG132 and SAC + MG132. (C) Treatment with α-toco + MG132, ALA + MG132, SFN + MG132 and SFN alone. ** p < 0.01.
Fig. 2. Detection of mitochondrial ROS.

Fig. 3. Effect of dietary antioxidants against ROS generated in mitochondria.

Notes: Mitochondrial ROS was detected using MitoSOX Red probe. Cells were treated with respective antioxidants only after 4 h of MG132 treatment with total incubation time of 8 h unlike simultaneous treatment in Fig. . Reprehensive fluorescence images of MitoSOX Red is shown in upper panels. All images are the same magnification; scale bar = 50 μm. The quantitated relative fluorescence intensity is shown as the mean ± SEM of three independent measurements in lower panel. ** p < 0.01.
Fig. 3. Effect of dietary antioxidants against ROS generated in mitochondria.

Fig. 4. MTT Cell viability assay.

Notes: Relative cell viability was determined by the MTT assay. Data are represented as relative fluorescence with respect to DMSO-treated cells. (A) treatment with DMSO (control), MG132, PQQ + MG132, Bio-PQQ™ + MG132, Res + MG132 and Ses + MG132. (B) treatment with Lyc + MG132, and SAC + MG132. (C) treatment with α-toco + MG132, ALA + MG132, SFN + MG132 and SFN alone. All of the treatments were carried out for 8 h. Quantitated values are shown as the mean ± SEM of three independent measurements. **: p < 0.01, NS = not significant.
Fig. 4. MTT Cell viability assay.
Supplemental material

Sunita_et_al_Supporting_Information.pdf

Download PDF (1.1 MB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.