Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/6832878a-9495-439c-bcf4-7157da94c447/tbbb_a_1136882_uf0001_oc.jpg)
Table 1. The analysis of variance table for two-way analysis of variance.
Fig. 1. Frequency distributions of the liquid hydrolysate glucose content in 208 rice cultivars in 2013 (a) and 2014 (b).
![Fig. 1. Frequency distributions of the liquid hydrolysate glucose content in 208 rice cultivars in 2013 (a) and 2014 (b).](/cms/asset/4bab2def-819e-4e52-b656-89164bc7138c/tbbb_a_1136882_f0001_b.gif)
Fig. 2. Frequency distributions of the liquid hydrolysate glucose content in (a) japonica rice cultivars in 2013, (b) indica rice cultivars in 2013, (c) japonica rice cultivars in 2014, and (d) indica rice cultivars in 2014.
![Fig. 2. Frequency distributions of the liquid hydrolysate glucose content in (a) japonica rice cultivars in 2013, (b) indica rice cultivars in 2013, (c) japonica rice cultivars in 2014, and (d) indica rice cultivars in 2014.](/cms/asset/c378c9db-5070-4b41-a29c-5df89fb2a140/tbbb_a_1136882_f0002_b.gif)
Fig. 3. Liquid hydrolysate glucose content of 208 rice cultivars in 2013 and 2014 (a) and relationships of liquid hydrolysate glucose content and total glucose content in rice straw in 2014 (b).
![Fig. 3. Liquid hydrolysate glucose content of 208 rice cultivars in 2013 and 2014 (a) and relationships of liquid hydrolysate glucose content and total glucose content in rice straw in 2014 (b).](/cms/asset/0f00737e-4066-436e-a53b-e66577bbc072/tbbb_a_1136882_f0003_b.gif)