1,156
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Highly anisotropic LC material with low dielectric loss for the application of tunable notch filters

& ORCID Icon
Pages 1070-1081 | Received 13 Mar 2018, Accepted 18 Feb 2019, Published online: 17 Mar 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed LC based tunable narrowband BSF.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed LC based tunable narrowband BSF.

Figure 2. Prototype of (a) Spurline structures and (b) embedded spurline structures.

Figure 2. Prototype of (a) Spurline structures and (b) embedded spurline structures.

Figure 3. S-parameters comparison of the spurline and embedded spurline structure prototype.

Figure 3. S-parameters comparison of the spurline and embedded spurline structure prototype.

Figure 4. Current distribution at the rejection frequency of 3.725 GHz for (a) the spurline structure and (b) embedded spurline structure prototype.

Figure 4. Current distribution at the rejection frequency of 3.725 GHz for (a) the spurline structure and (b) embedded spurline structure prototype.

Figure 5. The effects of (a) gap G1, and (b) resonator width w2, for the notch characteristics of the embedded spurline unit, and (c) current distributions at a stopband frequency of 3.725 GHz.

Figure 5. The effects of (a) gap G1, and (b) resonator width w2, for the notch characteristics of the embedded spurline unit, and (c) current distributions at a stopband frequency of 3.725 GHz.

Figure 6. Comparison of structures with two embedded spurline units (a) in series and (b) In parallel, and (c) transmission|S21|, and (d) Current distributions.

Figure 6. Comparison of structures with two embedded spurline units (a) in series and (b) In parallel, and (c) transmission|S21|, and (d) Current distributions.

Figure 7. (a) The transmission characteristics of the embedded spurline unit, and (b) Current distributions at the rejection frequency, when varying the LC dielectric loss tangent tanδ.

Figure 7. (a) The transmission characteristics of the embedded spurline unit, and (b) Current distributions at the rejection frequency, when varying the LC dielectric loss tangent tanδ.

Figure 8. Experimental setup for measurement.

Figure 8. Experimental setup for measurement.

Figure 9. Measured results of the device with respect to the LC bias voltage: (a) Transmission|S21|, (b) stopband rejection frequency, and (c) stopband 3 dB bandwidth and Q factor.

Figure 9. Measured results of the device with respect to the LC bias voltage: (a) Transmission|S21|, (b) stopband rejection frequency, and (c) stopband 3 dB bandwidth and Q factor.

Figure 10. Measured results of devices with three LC layer thicknesses: (a) Transmission |S21| under 0 and 20 Vrms bias voltage, and (b) stopband 3 dB bandwidth with respect to various LC bias voltages.

Figure 10. Measured results of devices with three LC layer thicknesses: (a) Transmission |S21| under 0 and 20 Vrms bias voltage, and (b) stopband 3 dB bandwidth with respect to various LC bias voltages.

Table 1. Comparison with recently reported LC based notch filters