Figures & data
Figure 1. Microperimetry results report of an initial MAIA assessment. The top-left image shows SLO of the fundus, and the top-right image shows combined SLO with SAP. The retinal sensitivity is color co-ordinated and measured in dB and the TRL is identified in blue as the Fixation Training Target (FTT). The bottom-left image identifies the 63% BCEA shown as the smaller purple ring and the larger purple ring represents 95% BCEA. Fixation stability P1 and P2 values are identified in along a normative colored scale.
![Figure 1. Microperimetry results report of an initial MAIA assessment. The top-left image shows SLO of the fundus, and the top-right image shows combined SLO with SAP. The retinal sensitivity is color co-ordinated and measured in dB and the TRL is identified in blue as the Fixation Training Target (FTT). The bottom-left image identifies the 63% BCEA shown as the smaller purple ring and the larger purple ring represents 95% BCEA. Fixation stability P1 and P2 values are identified in along a normative colored scale.](/cms/asset/b56562e3-dfdf-44ae-ac6e-a5d2ffc955f5/istr_a_2172435_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Progression of fixation training. The patient’s fixation parameters are identified as P1 (green circle), P2 (yellow circle), 63% BCEA (smaller purple circle) and 95% BCEA (larger purple circle). Image a represents fixation at the start of training and image b demonstrates the fixation progress toward the end of the training. Also note the TRL location is highly reproducible throughout the training.
![Figure 2. Progression of fixation training. The patient’s fixation parameters are identified as P1 (green circle), P2 (yellow circle), 63% BCEA (smaller purple circle) and 95% BCEA (larger purple circle). Image a represents fixation at the start of training and image b demonstrates the fixation progress toward the end of the training. Also note the TRL location is highly reproducible throughout the training.](/cms/asset/9ab0ffbd-a15a-4f55-ba82-6d6ebbe7115b/istr_a_2172435_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Mean, SD and statistical outcome of visual function parameters.
Table 2. Correlations between visual function parameters.