Personalized embryo transfer based on RNA sequencing endometrial receptivity test in repeated implantation failure patients: artificial cycle versus natural cycle

Figures & data

Table 1. Characteristic of the patients.

Characteristics	Natural cycle (n = 29)	Artificial cycle (n = 23)	p value
Age (years)	37.3 ± 5.4	37.8 ± 5.6	.96
BMI (kg/ m^2)	22.0 ± 1.9	21.8 ± 2.2	.78
Cycle length (days)	28.9 ± 1.4	28.7 ± 1.3	.58
Endometrial thickness (mm)	9.4 ± 1.4	9.2 ± 1.6	.75
Previous implantation failures	3.3 ± 0.6	3.4 ± 0.7	.81

Table 2. Receptivity status of the patients.

Receptivity status	Natural cycle (n = 29)	Artificial cycle (n = 23)	p value
Prereceptive	10 (34.5%)	9 (39.1%)	.73
Receptive	16 (55.2%)	12 (52.2%)	.83
Postreceptive	3 (10.3%)	2 (8.7%)	.84

Table 3. Implantation outcomes of patients in artificial cycle and natural cycle.

	Natural cycle (n = 29)			Artificial cycle (n = 23)			p value
Receptivity status	IR	CPR	LBR	IR	CPR	LBR	IR	CPR	LBR
Prereceptive	2 (20.0%)	2 (20.0%)	0 (0%)	7 (77.8%)	3 (33.3%)	1 (11.1%)	.01	.51	.28
Receptive	5 (31.3%)	5 (31.3%)	4 (25.0%)	4 (33.3%)	4 (33.3%)	1 (8.3%)	.91	.91	.25
Postreceptive	1 (33.3%)	1 (33.3%)	1 (33.3%)	1 (50.0%)	1 (50.0%)	1 (50.0%)	.71	.71	.71
Total	8 (27.6%)	8 (27.6%)	5 (17.2%)	12 (52.2%)	8 (34.8%)	3 (13.0%)	.07	.58	.68

Figure 1. Gene expression of patients in natural cycle and artificial cycle in WOI.