Impact of biomimetic electrical stimulation combined with Femoston on pregnancy rate and endometrium characteristics in infertility patients with thin endometrium: a prospective observational study

Figures & data

Table 1. Characteristics of the participants.

	Electrotherapy group (n = 60)	Femoston group (n = 60)
Age, years, mean ± SD	31.25 ± 2.68	31.10 ± 2.85
Course of disease
1-6 months, n (%)	36 (60.0)	37 (61.7)
7-12 months, n (%)	24 (40.0)	23 (38.3)
E2, mIU/ml	136.7	144.4
ESH level, mIU/ml	8.91	9.23
LH level, mIU/ml	4.68	4.00

Table 2. Outcomes of biomimetic electrical stimulation therapy on endometrial thickness, type, and pregnancy rate in female patients.

	Group, n	Endometrial thickness (mm)	Type A, B	Type C	Pregnancy rate
Before treatment	Electrotherapy group n = 60	4.66 ± 0.33	6 (10.00)	54 (90.00)	–
	Femoston group (n = 60)	4.68 ± 0.32	7 (11.67)	53 (88.33)	–
	P	0.515	0.769		–
After treatment	Electrotherapy group n = 60	6.48 ± 0.96	40 (66.67)	20 (33.33)	17 (28.33)
	Femoston group (n = 60)	5.27 ± 0.51	28 (46.67)	32 (53.33)	10 (16.67)
	P	< 0.001	0.027		0.126

Data availability statement

Data sharing does not apply to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.