Figures & data
Figure 1. Conceptual model regarding the relationship between management innovation, desorptive capacity, and external technology commercialization.
![Figure 1. Conceptual model regarding the relationship between management innovation, desorptive capacity, and external technology commercialization.](/cms/asset/d4e0577b-dafc-488f-986d-28c111931ad7/ctas_a_1895103_f0001_ob.jpg)
Table 1. Characteristics of the sample with organisations completing the first measurement (n = 84).
Figure 2. Structural equation model. Effect sizes: DE = direct effect; TE = total effect; IE = indirect effect. The total effect (consisting of both the direct and indirect effect) is given only when an indirect effect was measured. For the relationship between management innovation and external technology commercialization, only the indirect effect is given (the direct effect was found to be insignificant). *** = p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; † p < 0.1. Organization age was used to control the dependent variable.
![Figure 2. Structural equation model. Effect sizes: DE = direct effect; TE = total effect; IE = indirect effect. The total effect (consisting of both the direct and indirect effect) is given only when an indirect effect was measured. For the relationship between management innovation and external technology commercialization, only the indirect effect is given (the direct effect was found to be insignificant). *** = p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; † p < 0.1. Organization age was used to control the dependent variable.](/cms/asset/da112dcb-9a6d-470c-80fa-85bbd24a76ea/ctas_a_1895103_f0002_ob.jpg)
Table 2. Mean, standard deviation (S.D.), and correlations.
Table 3. Regression analysis.
Table A1. Survey variables and construct items.
Table A2. Results of the multi-trait scaling.