1,205
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Rapid detection of tenuazonic acid in cereal and fruit juice using a lateral-flow immunochromatographic assay strip

, , , , &
Pages 1293-1303 | Received 20 May 2017, Accepted 29 May 2017, Published online: 20 Jun 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. The characterization of coating antigens (TeA-BSA). (A) The UV-Vis spectra of coating antigens; (B) The SDS-PAGE image of coating antigens: (1) BSA; (2) TeA-BSA A1; (3) TeA-BSA A2; (4) TeA-BSA A3.

Figure 1. The characterization of coating antigens (TeA-BSA). (A) The UV-Vis spectra of coating antigens; (B) The SDS-PAGE image of coating antigens: (1) BSA; (2) TeA-BSA A1; (3) TeA-BSA A2; (4) TeA-BSA A3.

Figure 2. The characterization of anti-TeA mAb: (A) The standard curve for anti-TeA mAb; (B) The cross-reactivity for anti-TeA mAb.

Figure 2. The characterization of anti-TeA mAb: (A) The standard curve for anti-TeA mAb; (B) The cross-reactivity for anti-TeA mAb.

Figure 3. Optimization of lateral-flow ICA strip: (A) optimization of coating antigen with different synthesized methods; (B) Optimization of coating antigen A2 with different concentration on T line; (C) Optimization of suspension buffer with different surfactant reagents: (1) Basic, (2) PVP, (3) PEG, (4) PVA, (5) BSA, (6) casein, (7) sucrose, (8) trehalose, (9) sorbitol, (10) mannitol, (11) Tween-20, (12) Brij-35, (13) Triton X-100 and (14) On-870.

Figure 3. Optimization of lateral-flow ICA strip: (A) optimization of coating antigen with different synthesized methods; (B) Optimization of coating antigen A2 with different concentration on T line; (C) Optimization of suspension buffer with different surfactant reagents: (1) Basic, (2) PVP, (3) PEG, (4) PVA, (5) BSA, (6) casein, (7) sucrose, (8) trehalose, (9) sorbitol, (10) mannitol, (11) Tween-20, (12) Brij-35, (13) Triton X-100 and (14) On-870.

Figure 4. Sensitivity analysis of lateral-flow ICA strip. (A) Sensitivity analysis by naked eyes; (1) 0 ng/mL; (2) 100 ng/mL; (3) 200 ng/mL; (4) 400 ng/mL; (5) 800 ng/mL; (6) 1600 ng/mL; (7) 3200 ng/mL; (B) Sensitivity analysis by strip scan reader.

Figure 4. Sensitivity analysis of lateral-flow ICA strip. (A) Sensitivity analysis by naked eyes; (1) 0 ng/mL; (2) 100 ng/mL; (3) 200 ng/mL; (4) 400 ng/mL; (5) 800 ng/mL; (6) 1600 ng/mL; (7) 3200 ng/mL; (B) Sensitivity analysis by strip scan reader.

Figure 5. The sample test by lateral-flow ICA strip. (A) Wheat sample: (1) 0 ng/g; (2) 800 ng/g; (3) 1600 ng/g; (4) 3200 ng/g; (5) 6400 ng/g; (6) 12,800 ng/g; (7) 25,600 ng/g; (B) Apple juice sample: (1) 0 ng/mL; (2) 200 ng/mL; (3) 400 ng/mL; (4) 800 ng/mL; (5) 1600 ng/mL; (6) 3200 ng/mL; (7) 6400 ng/mL.

Figure 5. The sample test by lateral-flow ICA strip. (A) Wheat sample: (1) 0 ng/g; (2) 800 ng/g; (3) 1600 ng/g; (4) 3200 ng/g; (5) 6400 ng/g; (6) 12,800 ng/g; (7) 25,600 ng/g; (B) Apple juice sample: (1) 0 ng/mL; (2) 200 ng/mL; (3) 400 ng/mL; (4) 800 ng/mL; (5) 1600 ng/mL; (6) 3200 ng/mL; (7) 6400 ng/mL.

Table 1. The spiked sample analysis with lateral-flow ICA strip (n = 6).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.