Figures & data
Figure 1. (a) Macrophage proliferation index; (b) Macrophage cytotoxicity index; (c) Macrophage phagocytosis index. Values are means ± SDs. Different lowercase letters (a > b > c > d) means a significant difference in a different treatment group (P < .05).
![Figure 1. (a) Macrophage proliferation index; (b) Macrophage cytotoxicity index; (c) Macrophage phagocytosis index. Values are means ± SDs. Different lowercase letters (a > b > c > d) means a significant difference in a different treatment group (P < .05).](/cms/asset/908a0a21-7a97-4d4d-b409-78d2796d7cff/cfai_a_1754345_f0001_ob.jpg)
Figure 2. (a,b) NO production; (c) IL-1β concentration; (d) IL-10 concentration. Values are means ± SDs. Different lowercase letters (a > b > c > d) mean a significant difference in a different treatment group (P < .05).
![Figure 2. (a,b) NO production; (c) IL-1β concentration; (d) IL-10 concentration. Values are means ± SDs. Different lowercase letters (a > b > c > d) mean a significant difference in a different treatment group (P < .05).](/cms/asset/43afc2f5-9de3-4a9d-b8dc-7db61885d6e7/cfai_a_1754345_f0002_ob.jpg)
Figure 4. The Effects of FVP on the relative expression of mRNA in the colon. (a) IL-1β; (b) IL-10; (c) iNOS; (d) ZO-1. Values are means ± SDs. n = 12. Different lowercase letters (a > b) mean a significant difference in a different treatment group (P < .05).
![Figure 4. The Effects of FVP on the relative expression of mRNA in the colon. (a) IL-1β; (b) IL-10; (c) iNOS; (d) ZO-1. Values are means ± SDs. n = 12. Different lowercase letters (a > b) mean a significant difference in a different treatment group (P < .05).](/cms/asset/b3848aa8-4d02-45cb-8682-24f923f9340b/cfai_a_1754345_f0004_ob.jpg)
Figure 5. Mouse faecal microbiota diversity based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. (a) Principal Component Analysis (PCA); (b) sample cluster tree; (c) heat map; (d) Venn diagram.
![Figure 5. Mouse faecal microbiota diversity based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. (a) Principal Component Analysis (PCA); (b) sample cluster tree; (c) heat map; (d) Venn diagram.](/cms/asset/4d247f29-b636-4b7c-a3b4-672645a7723e/cfai_a_1754345_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. Gut microbial compositions of mice at phylum level. (a) Relative abundance of major phyla across 24 faecal microbiomes; (b) Relative abundance of Bacteroidetes across each grouped microbiome; (c) Relative abundance of Firmicutes across each grouped microbiome. Values are means ± SDs. n = 12. Different lowercase letters (a > b) mean a significant difference in a different treatment group (P < .05).
![Figure 6. Gut microbial compositions of mice at phylum level. (a) Relative abundance of major phyla across 24 faecal microbiomes; (b) Relative abundance of Bacteroidetes across each grouped microbiome; (c) Relative abundance of Firmicutes across each grouped microbiome. Values are means ± SDs. n = 12. Different lowercase letters (a > b) mean a significant difference in a different treatment group (P < .05).](/cms/asset/2d529de5-678f-4797-91b8-bbefb677d3f9/cfai_a_1754345_f0006_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. Gut microbial compositions of mice at the family level. (a) Relative abundance of major species across 24 faecal microbiomes; (b–g) Relative abundance of different species across each grouped microbiome. Values are means ± SDs. n = 12. Different lowercase letters (a > b) mean a significant difference in a different treatment group (P < .05).
![Figure 7. Gut microbial compositions of mice at the family level. (a) Relative abundance of major species across 24 faecal microbiomes; (b–g) Relative abundance of different species across each grouped microbiome. Values are means ± SDs. n = 12. Different lowercase letters (a > b) mean a significant difference in a different treatment group (P < .05).](/cms/asset/f85d8f6c-f9f7-4bdf-a552-4cc8dae5ce5a/cfai_a_1754345_f0007_oc.jpg)
Figure 8. Correlation of 17 species altered by FVP intervention by the Spearman correlation analysis. Heatmap shows the value of correlation coefficient. * and ** indicate the significant associations (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively). The circles (○) and dots (●) represent the less and more relative abundances of genus in the SD-FVP group compared with the SD group.
![Figure 8. Correlation of 17 species altered by FVP intervention by the Spearman correlation analysis. Heatmap shows the value of correlation coefficient. * and ** indicate the significant associations (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively). The circles (○) and dots (●) represent the less and more relative abundances of genus in the SD-FVP group compared with the SD group.](/cms/asset/6af03d5d-4ba3-4787-93b6-c5494dfdd1ed/cfai_a_1754345_f0008_oc.jpg)