Figures & data
Table 1. The sample pretreatment method used in this research.
Figure 2. (a) MALDI-TOF/MS spectrum of BSA; (b) MALDI-TOF/MS spectrum of PAX-EDC-BSA. The number of modifying groups (11.4) was determined by dividing the mass increase upon modification by the mass added by each modifying group (508.26 Da).
![Figure 2. (a) MALDI-TOF/MS spectrum of BSA; (b) MALDI-TOF/MS spectrum of PAX-EDC-BSA. The number of modifying groups (11.4) was determined by dividing the mass increase upon modification by the mass added by each modifying group (508.26 Da).](/cms/asset/33e7866f-6828-412d-bf64-e829df124595/cfai_a_2255759_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 2. icELISA assay parameters of serum and mAb 4F8.
Figure 4. Effects of a pH value of PBS buffer, b ionic strength, c concentration of acetonitrile, and d concentration of methanol on the performance of icELISA (N = 3).
![Figure 4. Effects of a pH value of PBS buffer, b ionic strength, c concentration of acetonitrile, and d concentration of methanol on the performance of icELISA (N = 3).](/cms/asset/9de0ef8c-0562-4dc8-b88d-70c5081732fa/cfai_a_2255759_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Comparison of different pretreatment methods for maize (a), wheat (b) and barley (c) samples.
![Figure 5. Comparison of different pretreatment methods for maize (a), wheat (b) and barley (c) samples.](/cms/asset/7c2728ae-1bfd-481f-9d59-a350f24754bb/cfai_a_2255759_f0005_ob.jpg)
Table 3. Mean recoveries and coefficients of variation of Paxilline in maize, wheat and barley samples (n = 3) MR mean recovery, CV coefficient of variation.