Close relationships, individual resilience resources, and well-being among people living with HIV/AIDS in rural China

Figures & data

Table 1. Demographic and HIV-related characteristics of participants.

	N (%)/M ± SD
Gender
Male	56 (35)
Female	104 (65)
Age	50.15 ± 7.49
Education (years)	5.56 ± 2.39
Duration of marriage (years)	26.28 ± 7.00
Family size	4.33 ± 1.44
Annual family income (RMB)	24,277.99 ± 9,254.43
Duration of HIV diagnosis	11.37 ± 1.47
Self-report treatment effect
Good	72 (45)
Moderate	71 (44.4)
Poor	9 (5.6)
Self-report side effect of treatment
Almost none	49 (30.6)
Some	85 (53.1)
Quit a lot	14 (8.8)
Almost unbearable	3 (1.9)

Table 2. Descriptive statistics and correlations of study variables.

		M ± SD	1	2	3	4	5
1.	Marital relationship	7.02 ± 1.49	–
2.	Family relationship	1.03 ± 1.72	.46**	–
3.	Individual resilience resources	3.18 ± .57	.51**	.45**	–
4.	General well-being	3.03 ± 1.00	.26**	.23**	.40**	–
5.	Physically unhealthy days	8.85 ± 5.87	−.29**	−.30**	−.43**	−.51**	–
6.	Mentally unhealthy days	8.33 ± 5.59	−.24**	−.27**	−.31**	−.53**	.87**

*p < .05, **p < .01.

Figure 1. The mediation role of individual resilience resources on well-being.

Notes: *p < .05, **p < .01.

Table 3. Estimated mediation effects of individual resilience resources on well-being.

Mediation effect	Indirect Effect	95% Confidence Interval
Marital relationship → Individual resilience resources → General well-being	.07*	[.02, .12]
Marital relationship → Individual resilience resources → Physically unhealthy days	−.32*	[−.56, −.07]
Marital relationship → Individual resilience resources → Mentally unhealthy days	−.28*	[−.53, −.03]
Family relationship → Individual resilience resources → General well-being	.31*	[.02,.59]
Family relationship → Individual resilience resources → Physically unhealthy days	−1.38*	[−2.75, −.20]
Family relationship → Individual resilience resources → Mentally unhealthy days	−1.20^†	[−2.51,.01]

^†p < .1, *p < .05, **p < .01.