726
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Risk of neutropenia in psoriasis patients prescribed anti-IL-23 antibody in comparison with anti-IL-17 antibody or adalimumab based on real-world data from the MID-NET® in Japan

, , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2373826 | Received 01 Apr 2024, Accepted 06 Jun 2024, Published online: 04 Jul 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flow chart for patient selection.

Figure 1. Flow chart for patient selection.

Table 1. Summary of patient background at the baseline.

Figure 2. Comparison of neutropenia in anti-IL-23 antibody group with anti-IL-17 antibody, adalimumab, and apremilast groups.

CI: confidence interval, cHR: crude hazard ratio, aHR: adjusted hazard ratio, –: not applicable.

1: When the number of patients was <10, an aggregated value was presented based on the MID-NET® publication rule, so that a specific number could not be identified.

2: aHR, weighted by the inverse of the propensity score, which was estimated using a logistic regression model including covariates (see Supplementary Table S3 for the list of covariates considered in this study).

Figure 2. Comparison of neutropenia in anti-IL-23 antibody group with anti-IL-17 antibody, adalimumab, and apremilast groups.CI: confidence interval, cHR: crude hazard ratio, aHR: adjusted hazard ratio, –: not applicable.1: When the number of patients was <10, an aggregated value was presented based on the MID-NET® publication rule, so that a specific number could not be identified.2: aHR, weighted by the inverse of the propensity score, which was estimated using a logistic regression model including covariates (see Supplementary Table S3 for the list of covariates considered in this study).

Table 2. Summary of results from the sensitivity analysis (anti-IL-23 antibody vs. anti-IL-17 antibody, adalimumab, or apremilast).

Supplemental material

Supplementary file_final240606.docx

Download MS Word (503.9 KB)

Data availability statement

The dataset generated in the study is not publicly available due to the terms of use for MID-NET® to which we adhered when conducting this study; the accessibility of the dataset used for this analysis is restricted to specific authors including the corresponding author in a predetermined secure environment. No outside researchers are allowed to access the dataset.