3,495
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Extracellular vesicles mediate low dose ionizing radiation-induced immune and inflammatory responses in the blood

, , , , , & show all
Pages 12-22 | Received 15 Sep 2017, Accepted 23 Feb 2018, Published online: 29 Mar 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. The workflow of the study: C57Bl/6 mice were irradiated with different doses of ionizing radiation (0, 0.1, and 2 Gy). Mice were sacrificed 24 h later, bone marrow from femur and tibia, and whole blood from hepatic vein were collected. Plasma was separated from blood, extracellular vesicles were isolated and were subjected to miRNA profiling. Extracellular vesicles were isolated from the bone marrow supernatant as well. Bystander effects were monitored by injecting the bone marrow-derived extracellular vesicles in sham-irradiated healthy mice and 24 h later blood was harvested similarly to the directly irradiated animals. Protein profiling was performed from the plasma of directly irradiated and bystander animals.

Figure 1. The workflow of the study: C57Bl/6 mice were irradiated with different doses of ionizing radiation (0, 0.1, and 2 Gy). Mice were sacrificed 24 h later, bone marrow from femur and tibia, and whole blood from hepatic vein were collected. Plasma was separated from blood, extracellular vesicles were isolated and were subjected to miRNA profiling. Extracellular vesicles were isolated from the bone marrow supernatant as well. Bystander effects were monitored by injecting the bone marrow-derived extracellular vesicles in sham-irradiated healthy mice and 24 h later blood was harvested similarly to the directly irradiated animals. Protein profiling was performed from the plasma of directly irradiated and bystander animals.

Figure 2. Western blot analysis of plasma-derived extracellular vesicles extracellular vesicles were isolated with Exiqon’s miRCURY Exosome Isolation Kit – Serum and Plasma and western blot analysis of extracellular vesicles for calnexin, TSG101 and CD9 was performed as detailed in the Materials and methods section. The blot shows, whole cell lysate (lane 1), plasma extracellular vesicles isolated from sham irradiated mice (lane 2), total-body irradiated mice with 0.1 Gy (lane 3) and 2 Gy (lane 4). The sizes (in kD) of the investigated proteins are shown on the right.

Figure 2. Western blot analysis of plasma-derived extracellular vesicles extracellular vesicles were isolated with Exiqon’s miRCURY Exosome Isolation Kit – Serum and Plasma and western blot analysis of extracellular vesicles for calnexin, TSG101 and CD9 was performed as detailed in the Materials and methods section. The blot shows, whole cell lysate (lane 1), plasma extracellular vesicles isolated from sham irradiated mice (lane 2), total-body irradiated mice with 0.1 Gy (lane 3) and 2 Gy (lane 4). The sizes (in kD) of the investigated proteins are shown on the right.

Figure 3. Protein profiling of blood from directly irradiated and bystander animals plasma was separated from whole blood by centrifugation and loaded on proteome profiler antibody array membranes. Spots were detected by chemiluminescent method as detailed in the Materials and methods section. The graph shows fold change differences in protein levels in directly irradiated mice compared to sham-irradiated mice (a and b) or in bystander mice compared to mice injected with EVs from sham-irradiated mice (c and d). Bars represent mean ± standard deviations (SD) (N = 3). Significance was tested by Student’s t-test (*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001).

Figure 3. Protein profiling of blood from directly irradiated and bystander animals plasma was separated from whole blood by centrifugation and loaded on proteome profiler antibody array membranes. Spots were detected by chemiluminescent method as detailed in the Materials and methods section. The graph shows fold change differences in protein levels in directly irradiated mice compared to sham-irradiated mice (a and b) or in bystander mice compared to mice injected with EVs from sham-irradiated mice (c and d). Bars represent mean ± standard deviations (SD) (N = 3). Significance was tested by Student’s t-test (*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001).

Figure 4. miRNAs differentially expressed in plasma-derived extracellular vesicles from irradiated mice. A miRNA profiling of extracellular vesicles isolated from plasma of sham irradiated mice and mice irradiated with 0.1 or 2 Gy was performed by a qPCR array comprising of 752 miRNAs as described in the Materials and methods section. miRNAs with significantly modulated expression levels after 0.1 Gy (a) and 2 Gy (b) relative to sham-treated controls are presented. Data are the mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments. Significance was tested by Student’s t-test (*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001).

Figure 4. miRNAs differentially expressed in plasma-derived extracellular vesicles from irradiated mice. A miRNA profiling of extracellular vesicles isolated from plasma of sham irradiated mice and mice irradiated with 0.1 or 2 Gy was performed by a qPCR array comprising of 752 miRNAs as described in the Materials and methods section. miRNAs with significantly modulated expression levels after 0.1 Gy (a) and 2 Gy (b) relative to sham-treated controls are presented. Data are the mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments. Significance was tested by Student’s t-test (*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001).

Table 1. KEGG pathways affected by both low and high dose irradiations, the number of regulated genes within the pathways and the number of miRNAs targeting these genes.

Table 2. miRNAs and their target mRNAs participating in AML pathway.

Table 3. miRNAs and their target mRNAs participating in TGFβ pathway.

Table 4. Immune- and inflammation-related common pathways regulated by differentially expressed miRNAs in the EVs derived from plasma and BM.

Table 5. Altered plasma proteins in bystander animals and their putative miRNA regulators which were differentially expressed in BM-derived EVs from irradiated animals.

Supplemental material

Supplementary_figure_1_legend.docx

Download MS Word (13.3 KB)

supplementary_figure_1.tif

Download TIFF Image (122.8 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.