Figures & data
Figure 1. Flow chart, recruitment of study population.
Notes: aIndividuals who were unable to attend examination; bIndividuals who denied participation or could not be located; cIndividuals with complete data on FACIT-Fatigue; dIndividuals with complete data on HGS; eIndividuals with complete data on IPAQ; fIndividuals with complete data on HGS & FACIT-Fatigue; gIndividuals with complete data on HGS & IPAQ; hIndividuals with complete data on HGS, FACIT-Fatigue & IPAQ.
![Figure 1. Flow chart, recruitment of study population.Notes: aIndividuals who were unable to attend examination; bIndividuals who denied participation or could not be located; cIndividuals with complete data on FACIT-Fatigue; dIndividuals with complete data on HGS; eIndividuals with complete data on IPAQ; fIndividuals with complete data on HGS & FACIT-Fatigue; gIndividuals with complete data on HGS & IPAQ; hIndividuals with complete data on HGS, FACIT-Fatigue & IPAQ.](/cms/asset/4122e085-3ae8-49eb-88e4-34121b32a1d4/iptp_a_1486490_f0001_b.gif)
Table 1. Basic characteristics of individuals participating in clinical examination and measure of hand grip strength (HGS), comparing individuals with and without COPD, among women and men, respectively.
Table 2. Comparing A) fatigue assessed by the FACIT-fatigue questionnaire, and B) physical activity assessed by the IPAQ questionnaire, between individuals with and without COPD, among women and men, respectively.
Table 3. Comparing mean HGS (SD) among those with and without clinically relevant fatigue (CRF) in COPD and non-COPD, among women and men, respectively.
Table 4. Comparing mean HGS (SD) between those with a category of low and moderate/high physical activity level according to IPAQ, among women and men, respectively.
Table 5. Multiple linear regression models analyzing the association between HGS, fatigue and low physical activity among A) women and B) men.