Figures & data
Table 1. Characteristics of the participants.
Table 2. Intra- and inter-rater reliability results of PPT algometry in persons with KOA.
Figure 1. Level of agreement between rater A’s 2. and 3. measurements.
![Figure 1. Level of agreement between rater A’s 2. and 3. measurements.](/cms/asset/61cfb885-3544-414c-a53d-9a29d825351f/iptp_a_2023929_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Level of agreement between rater B’s 2. and 3. measurements.
![Figure 2. Level of agreement between rater B’s 2. and 3. measurements.](/cms/asset/672dabea-189d-480d-a6ce-fbc27df8362c/iptp_a_2023929_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Level of agreement between rater C’s 2. and 3. measurements.
![Figure 3. Level of agreement between rater C’s 2. and 3. measurements.](/cms/asset/f9d2ec2a-9ae0-404f-93ec-e9d5824d4e0d/iptp_a_2023929_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. Level of agreement between rater A’s and B’s 2.-3. measurements.
![Figure 4. Level of agreement between rater A’s and B’s 2.-3. measurements.](/cms/asset/17559fca-3e9b-445e-bc57-dcd8d9a953bf/iptp_a_2023929_f0004_b.gif)