Figures & data
Table 1. Demographics of interviewed physical therapists from the care-as-usual and MOTIFS conditions.
Figure 1. Participant flow diagram. *Approached physical therapists pre-screened for eligibility § n=2 interviews not included in analysis due to reaching data saturation MOTIFS = MOT or Imagery to Facilitate Sensorimotor re-learning.
![Figure 1. Participant flow diagram. *Approached physical therapists pre-screened for eligibility § n=2 interviews not included in analysis due to reaching data saturation MOTIFS = MOT or Imagery to Facilitate Sensorimotor re-learning.](/cms/asset/fa8bae99-d1b4-479c-8866-39482e28f99e/iptp_a_2176729_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Major Theme regarding physical therapists’ perceptions of rehabilitation training, along with more detailed subordinate themes.
![Figure 2. Major Theme regarding physical therapists’ perceptions of rehabilitation training, along with more detailed subordinate themes.](/cms/asset/fd9a46b0-1fae-460b-89fb-37a3579ce988/iptp_a_2176729_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Major theme regarding care-as-usual physical therapists’ perceptions of rehabilitation training and more detailed subordinate themes.
![Figure 3. Major theme regarding care-as-usual physical therapists’ perceptions of rehabilitation training and more detailed subordinate themes.](/cms/asset/8e6e5cfe-ef97-4fb6-b723-ce56d3b5bc3a/iptp_a_2176729_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table A1. Coding comparison analysis progression through versions of the generated conceptual models.
Table A2. Description of data collection and analysis process, including Coder roles and involvement.