1,938
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

New group memberships formed after an acquired brain injury and posttraumatic growth: A prospective study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 2054-2076 | Received 26 Jun 2021, Accepted 17 Dec 2021, Published online: 20 Jan 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Pathways through which social group memberships can influence adjustment to an ABI, as hypothesized by SIMIC, adapted from Haslam et al. (Citation2018, p. 238).

Figure 1. Pathways through which social group memberships can influence adjustment to an ABI, as hypothesized by SIMIC, adapted from Haslam et al. (Citation2018, p. 238).

Table 1. Mean, standard deviation, minimum, and maximum of main study variables.

Table 2. Correlations between PTG at time 1 and time 2 with other study related variables (N = 36).

Figure 2. While the greater number of groups people maintained from pre- to post-injury predicted greater connectedness with these groups, there was no relationship between groups maintained and PTG at time 2, controlling for specified covariates.

Figure 2. While the greater number of groups people maintained from pre- to post-injury predicted greater connectedness with these groups, there was no relationship between groups maintained and PTG at time 2, controlling for specified covariates.

Figure 3. Number of new groups was indirectly associated with PTG at time 2, via connectedness with these new groups, controlling for pre-injury groups, maintained groups, time since injury, age, and PTG at time 1.

Figure 3. Number of new groups was indirectly associated with PTG at time 2, via connectedness with these new groups, controlling for pre-injury groups, maintained groups, time since injury, age, and PTG at time 1.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.