Figures & data
A flow chart detailing the number of service users considered for participation (285), the number who did not meet inclusion criteria (60), the number who met inclusion criteria but also met an exclusion criteria (75), the number who met the study criteria but were not referred for a different reason (87) and the number who were referred to the study (63).
A flow chart describing the number of participants referred (63), the number enrolled (39), the number randomized following 3 week baseline (29), the number who recieved the app (21) and the number who completed follow-up (19).
Overview of themes from the qualitative analysis. Feedback was split into “Usability” and “Usefulness” themes. Sub-themes of “Usability” were “Comments about feeling competent” “Facilitators” (with sub-themes “app design,” “perceived need,” “tutorial and practice,” “help from others”) and “Barriers” (with sub-themes “hardware issues,” “app issues,” “lack of help from others,” “lack of perceived ability with technology” and “memory and cognitive challenges”). “Usefulness” sub-themes include “Use cases,” “Facilitators” (with sub-themes “improvement on Previous memory strategies,” “useful app features,” “suggested features to improve usefulness”), and “Barriers” (with sub-themes “hardware issues,” “app issues,” “already use well established strategies” and “not much to be reminded about”).
Supplemental material