Figures & data
Table 1. Participant demographic and injury information.
Figure 1. Conceptual model of reflexive thematic themes.
![Figure 1. Conceptual model of reflexive thematic themes.](/cms/asset/b11e17ca-19ab-48ba-8a11-58ceee998ef8/pnrh_a_2359992_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Distribution of overall intervention acceptability ratings. *Indicates different response scale; please rate how satisfied you were with VaLiANT overall (extremely dissatisfied, a little bit dissatisfied, indifferent, mostly satisfied, extremely satisfied), please rate how helpful you found VaLiANT (not at all helpful, slightly helpful, somewhat helpful, moderately helpful, very helpful).
![Figure 2. Distribution of overall intervention acceptability ratings. *Indicates different response scale; please rate how satisfied you were with VaLiANT overall (extremely dissatisfied, a little bit dissatisfied, indifferent, mostly satisfied, extremely satisfied), please rate how helpful you found VaLiANT (not at all helpful, slightly helpful, somewhat helpful, moderately helpful, very helpful).](/cms/asset/cc8c0d9c-ec92-430f-8af9-730babc3dc20/pnrh_a_2359992_f0002_ob.jpg)
Table 2. Ratings of intervention components and individual sessions.