Figures & data
Table 1. The variation of creep cavitation coefficient A [Citation5].
Figure 1. The variation of creep cavitation coefficient A with different variations of stress and temperature [Citation6].
![Figure 1. The variation of creep cavitation coefficient A with different variations of stress and temperature [Citation6].](/cms/asset/c2227f70-dd89-45d5-8791-8d381e90bfef/ymht_a_1388603_f0001_oc.gif)
Figure 2. Comparison of conventional hyperbolic sine law with experiment [Citation8] for 2·25Cr–1Mo steel [Citation9].
![Figure 2. Comparison of conventional hyperbolic sine law with experiment [Citation8] for 2·25Cr–1Mo steel [Citation9].](/cms/asset/36d95a96-c2eb-4aea-b3ab-ea5229c0b8de/ymht_a_1388603_f0002_oc.gif)
Figure 3. Comparison of conventional hyperbolic sine law with experiment [Citation10] for 0·5Cr–0·5Mo–0·25 V steel [Citation9].
![Figure 3. Comparison of conventional hyperbolic sine law with experiment [Citation10] for 0·5Cr–0·5Mo–0·25 V steel [Citation9].](/cms/asset/98ef6142-8ea9-431d-aa3e-08eb72545305/ymht_a_1388603_f0003_oc.gif)
Figure 4. Comparison of modified hyperbolic sine law with the conventional one and experimental data [Citation8] of 0·5Cr–0·5Mo–0·25 V steel [Citation9].
![Figure 4. Comparison of modified hyperbolic sine law with the conventional one and experimental data [Citation8] of 0·5Cr–0·5Mo–0·25 V steel [Citation9].](/cms/asset/eb4fdf61-20ea-41d4-9e51-740cc3d4412c/ymht_a_1388603_f0004_oc.gif)
Figure 5. Comparison of modified hyperbolic sine law with the conventional one and experimental data [Citation10] of 2·25Cr–1Mo steel [Citation9].
![Figure 5. Comparison of modified hyperbolic sine law with the conventional one and experimental data [Citation10] of 2·25Cr–1Mo steel [Citation9].](/cms/asset/156926d3-f589-492a-a28c-4b7b0bc206d5/ymht_a_1388603_f0005_oc.gif)
Table 2. The typical functions between minimum creep strain rate and stress [Citation14].
Figure 6. Experimental data of minimum strain rate and stress at 600 °C under 70–200 MPa for P91 steel [Citation11].
![Figure 6. Experimental data of minimum strain rate and stress at 600 °C under 70–200 MPa for P91 steel [Citation11].](/cms/asset/8d89591c-a37f-41dd-9b1f-d45047324d49/ymht_a_1388603_f0006_oc.gif)
Figure 7. The modelling result of conventional hyperbolic sine law compared with experimental data of P91 steel.
![Figure 7. The modelling result of conventional hyperbolic sine law compared with experimental data of P91 steel.](/cms/asset/15633d1b-e316-45e3-96ed-22c88950e09f/ymht_a_1388603_f0007_oc.gif)
Figure 9. The modelling result of modified hyperbolic sine law compared with experimental data for P91 steel.
![Figure 9. The modelling result of modified hyperbolic sine law compared with experimental data for P91 steel.](/cms/asset/6fc949f7-98f2-47fd-ae59-5cacaaecfa29/ymht_a_1388603_f0009_oc.gif)
Figure 10. The comparison between different function of minimum creep strain rate and applied stress for P91 steel.
![Figure 10. The comparison between different function of minimum creep strain rate and applied stress for P91 steel.](/cms/asset/6821c80f-0b26-4655-a9c0-fe3881ae4b99/ymht_a_1388603_f0010_oc.gif)
Figure 11. Probability density function of cavity equivalent R for P91, experimental data from ref [Citation21].
![Figure 11. Probability density function of cavity equivalent R for P91, experimental data from ref [Citation21].](/cms/asset/6dfe28a7-93b1-4bab-9a9e-80f402eb2c07/ymht_a_1388603_f0011_oc.gif)