843
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Carbonation as a sensory enhancement strategy: a narrative synthesis of existing evidence

, &
Pages 1958-1967 | Received 07 Mar 2016, Accepted 13 Jul 2016, Published online: 19 Sep 2016
 

Abstract

Purpose: Sensory enhancement techniques, like other compensatory strategies, aim to reduce dysphagia symptoms. The use of carbonated liquids has been proposed as a possible sensory technique, however to date, there is limited information of its efficacy or guidance for clinical implementation. A narrative synthesis was completed to determine the quality and strength of the evidence base for use of carbonation as a compensatory strategy in dysphagia rehabilitation.

Methods: From 101 articles initially identified, 14 articles met the study criteria. Eleven papers described the effects of carbonation on swallowing in healthy participants whereas three described the impact of carbonation in dysphagic populations. A narrative synthesis of papers was undertaken given the diversity of identified studies.

Results: Synthesis of findings was challenging given the exploratory phase of most research activity with diverse populations described and extensive differences in research methodologies. There is currently weak, but potentially positive evidence to support using carbonation as a compensatory technique in dysphagia rehabilitation.

Conclusion: Despite future potential, existing evidence fails to provide clear direction for the clinical implementation of carbonation. Validation of carbonation use with the dysphagic population requires further research with consistent, controlled methodologies, and larger cohorts of participants to inform potential for dysphagia rehabilitation.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • The use of carbonated liquids has been proposed as a possible sensory enhancement technique which may facilitate changes to swallow physiology.

  • However to date, there is limited information to direct clinical implementation.

  • This paper provides a narrative synthesis of existing knowledge and highlights possible limitations of findings reported.

  • Research to date has used disparate research methodologies in varied populations making synthesis of current findings challenging.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Speech Pathology department, RBWH, Brisbane, Australia for support and assistance in completing this review.

Disclosure statement

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest or competing interests.

Funding

This review was funded in part by a grant from the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Foundation Trust.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.