3,118
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

The Big Five personality factors and psychological well-being following stroke: a systematic review

ORCID Icon &
Pages 1119-1130 | Received 19 Apr 2017, Accepted 16 Dec 2017, Published online: 22 Dec 2017
 

Abstract

Purpose: To identify and appraise studies investigating the relationship between the Big Five personality factors and psychological well-being following stroke and evidence for personality change.

Methods: Systematic searches of six databases (PsychINFO, CINAHL, Ovid Medline, Cochrane, PubMed, and Web of Science) were conducted from inception to June 2017. Studies involving adult stroke samples that employed a validated measure of at least one of the Big Five personality factors were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility and methodological quality of studies.

Results: Eleven studies were identified that assessed associations between personality and psychological well-being after stroke (nine studies) or post-stroke personality change (two studies). A consistent finding was that higher neuroticism was significantly related to poorer psychological well-being. The evidence for the other Big Five factors was mixed. In terms of personality change, two cross-sectional studies reported high rates of elevated neuroticism (38–48%) and low extraversion (33–40%) relative to normative data. Different questionnaires and approaches to measuring personality (i.e., self vs. informant ratings, premorbid personality vs. current personality) complicated comparisons between studies.

Conclusions: People high on neuroticism are at increased risk of poor psychological well-being after stroke. Prospective longitudinal studies are needed to address the limited research on post-stroke personality change.

    Implications for rehabilitation

  • High neuroticism is associated with poorer psychological well-being after stroke.

  • Assessing personality characteristics early after stroke may help to identify those at risk of poor psychological outcomes.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no declaration of interest.

ORCID

Toni Dwan [INSERT ORCID LOGO] 0000-0003-1604-3243

Additional information

Funding

Preparation of this paper was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award Scholarship held by the first author.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.