462
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Measurement properties of the Reaching Performance Scale for Stroke

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1171-1175 | Received 10 Feb 2019, Accepted 29 Jul 2019, Published online: 20 Aug 2019
 

Abstract

Aim

Reaching Performance Scale for Stroke (RPSS) evaluates the upper limb reach-to-grasp movement quality and compensatory movements. The objective of the study was to test the reliability, construct validity, and interpretability of the Brazilian-Portuguese RPSS.

Methods

Fifty-one individuals (mean age 62 ± 10.8 years), with acute-to-chronic stroke (range: 1–300 months) were video recorded while performing a reach-to-grasp task of a cone placed both close and far from the individual. Their degree of motor impairment ranged from 4 to 59 points in the Fugl-Meyer scale.

Results

Reaching Performance Scale for Stroke showed excellent intra- (ICC2,1 = 1.00) and interrater (ICC2,1 = 0.98–0.99) reliability, and redundant internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.98). The construct validity between RPSS and Fugl-Meyer scale was strong (Spearman rho = 0.88–0.89; p < 0.0001). The scale was able to discriminate individuals with mild or moderate upper limb impairment from those with severe impairment. We found ceiling and floor effects.

Conclusions

Reaching Performance Scale for Stroke showed excellent reliability and redundant internal consistency. The construct validity with the Fugl-Meyer scale was strong. Reaching Performance Scale for Stroke was able to discriminate individuals with different levels of upper limb impairment.

    IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

  • Post-stroke individuals develop compensatory strategies to perform reaching movements with the paretic upper limb.

  • The Reaching Performance Scale for Stroke provides a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the reach-to-grasp movement.

  • The Reaching Performance Scale for Stroke is suitable for use with Brazilian-Portuguese speakers and has adequate reliability and validity.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Dr. Mindy F. Levin for permission to adapt the original version of the RPSS and the valuable comments on this manuscript.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 374.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.