2,042
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Replacing sitting with light-intensity physical activity throughout the day versus 1 bout of vigorous-intensity exercise: similar cardiometabolic health effects in multiple sclerosis. A randomised cross-over study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 3293-3302 | Received 12 Apr 2022, Accepted 04 Sep 2022, Published online: 03 Oct 2022

Figures & data

Figure 1. Study design. After checking study eligibility and performing a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) during the screening visit, participants performed four 4-day activity regimens [CONTROL, SIT, LIPA (light-intensity physical activity), EX (exercise) regimen] in free-living conditions, followed by a test day to assess outcomes and a wash-out period of 10 days. Habitual physical activity levels were maintained during the CONTROL regimen and manipulated as indicated during the subsequent regimens. The order of the SIT and LIPA regimen was randomised.

Visual representation of the study design in five subsequent blocks, with a first block showing the measurements during the screening visit (checking study eligibility and a cardiopulmonary exercise test), and four blocks showing the order of the four regimens (CONTROL first, EX last and SIT and LIPA randomised as second or third regimen) and the imposed protocol of physical activity and sedentary behaviour within each regimen.
Figure 1. Study design. After checking study eligibility and performing a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) during the screening visit, participants performed four 4-day activity regimens [CONTROL, SIT, LIPA (light-intensity physical activity), EX (exercise) regimen] in free-living conditions, followed by a test day to assess outcomes and a wash-out period of 10 days. Habitual physical activity levels were maintained during the CONTROL regimen and manipulated as indicated during the subsequent regimens. The order of the SIT and LIPA regimen was randomised.

Figure 2. Flow chart of study participants.

Flow chart of blocks connected to each other, showing the number of participants who started with the study at the top of the chart (36 persons were assessed for eligibility, from who 28 were included), and the number of participants who completed the study at the bottom the chart (27 completed the CONTROL regimen, 25 the SIT regimen, 24 the LIPA regimen and 21 the EX regime).
Figure 2. Flow chart of study participants.

Table 1. Subject characteristics (n: 28).

Table 2. Physical activity during the activity regimens.

Figure 3. Two-hour oral glucose tolerance tests. (A,C) Average insulin and glucose levels per time point of the 2-h oral glucose tolerance test per activity regimen (

CONTROL,
SIT,
LIPA,
EX). (B,D) Total area under the curve (tAUC) for insulin and glucose concentrations shown in (A,C). Data are presented as estimated means ± SEM. LIPA: light-intensity physical activity; EX: exercise. #Trend towards significant difference (p = 0.054 at 45 min for SIT vs. LIPA, p = 0.063 at 60 min for SIT vs. EX). All analyses were Bonferroni corrected.

A four-section graphical representation of glucose and insulin concentrations during the 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests per activity regimen. The left panels are curves showing glucose and insulin levels per time point, the right panels are bars showing the total area under the curve for the left panels. Only the total area under the curve for insulin was significantly different between SIT and LIPA, and SIT and EX (p < 0.001).
Figure 3. Two-hour oral glucose tolerance tests. (A,C) Average insulin and glucose levels per time point of the 2-h oral glucose tolerance test per activity regimen (Display full size CONTROL, Display full size SIT, Display full size LIPA, Display full size EX). (B,D) Total area under the curve (tAUC) for insulin and glucose concentrations shown in (A,C). Data are presented as estimated means ± SEM. LIPA: light-intensity physical activity; EX: exercise. #Trend towards significant difference (p = 0.054 at 45 min for SIT vs. LIPA, p = 0.063 at 60 min for SIT vs. EX). All analyses were Bonferroni corrected.

Table 3. Cardiometabolic health outcomes.